A 2023 poll taken between August 21st and September 15th by the Public Religion Research Institute showed that 28% of Americans between the ages of 12 and 25 now identify as either “Bisexual,” “Gay or Lesbian,” or “Something Else.” Only 72% of this age group defined themselves as being “Straight.” This age group, in case you aren’t aware, is known as “Generation Z.”
According to this recent poll, even though 90% of all Americans identify as Straight, the younger the generation, the lesser this rate will be. The numbers read as follows:
The “Silent Generation” (people born between 1925 and 1945): 97% Straight
The “Baby Boomers” (people born between 1946 and 1964): 96% Straight
The “Generation Xers” (people born between 1965 and 1980): 93% Straight
The “Millennials” (people born between 1981 and 1996): 84% Straight
The “Generation Z” (people born between 1997 and 2012): 72% Straight
Even though no poll can ever be a thoroughly precise rendering of a situation, it is undeniable that LGBTQ, which stands for Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer (or at least Questioning), is on the rise in the ranks of America’s younger generations. This is why it is so vitally important that we Bible-believing Christians continue to convey what the Bible teaches about sexuality. Therefore, even though I have presented this information in past posts, I feel compelled to offer it again right now.
The Biblical case against anything other than being “Straight” is as follows (all references from the N.K.J.V.):
1. Genesis 1:26-28; Matthew 19:4-6: God’s plan for the sexual relationship is obviously man-woman.
2. Genesis 19:1-29; Ezekiel 16:49-50; 2 Peter 2:4-6; Jude v.7: Homosexuality was rampant in the twin cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, and God destroyed those cities for their wickedness. The Ezekiel passage uses the word “abomination” in reference to homosexuality, while the Jude verse describes the sin as giving one’s self over to sexual immorality and going after “strange flesh.”
3. Leviticus 18:22; 20:13; Deuteronomy 23:17: Under that body of law God gave the Israelites to live by, homosexuality was a crime. More than that, it was a capital punishment offense (Leviticus 18:29, “cut off” means “put to death”). Again, the word “abomination” is used in the Leviticus verses in reference to the sin. Furthermore, the context of the Leviticus 18:22 verse groups homosexuality with incest (Leviticus 18:6-18) and bestiality (Leviticus 18:23).
4. Judges 19:11-30: This passage gives an account from the days when various Judges ruled over different parts of Israel. It labels a group of homosexuals as “perverted men.”
5. 1 Kings 14:21-24; 15:9-15; 22:41-46; 2 Kings 22:1-2; 23:7: The homosexuals (“perverted persons”) who are mentioned in these passages were religious prostitutes who played major roles in the worship of false gods. There is a distinct pattern seen in the passages. During the reigns of good kings, these sodomites were banished from the land. During the reigns of wicked kings, they were allowed to remain in the land.
6. Romans 1:18-32: These verses trace the origins of homosexuality and lesbianism back to mankind’s rejecting of God and embracing of idol worship. Homosexuals and lesbians are labeled as people who have: a knowledge of God (v.18-21), no excuse (v.20), a lack of glorifying God (v.21), a lack of thankfulness (v.21), futile thoughts (v.21), foolish, darkened hearts (v.21-22), a profession of wisdom (v.22), a foolishness about them (v.22), a bent towards idolatry (v.23), unclean, lustful hearts (v.24), dishonored bodies (v.24), an abandonment of the truth (v.25), a worship of self (v.25), vile passions (v.26), a desire to pervert nature (v.26-27), shameful conduct (v.27), a forgetfulness of God (v.28), debased minds (v.28), a love of doing those things which aren’t fitting (v.28), a nature geared towards being ungodly in many other ways (v.29-31), a knowledge of the judgment of God (v.32), a worthiness of death (v.32), and an approval of others who commit the same sins (v.32). Actually, the argument that homosexuality is “natural” is correct in one sense. The sin is just as natural to sin-fallen mankind as rebelling against God and worshipping false gods.
7. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11: The category “homosexuals” (N.K.J.V.) or “effeminate” (K.J.V.) refers to homosexuals as does the category “sodomites” (N.K.J.V.) or “abusers of themselves with mankind” (K.J.V.). It is noteworthy that this passage teaches that the homosexual doesn’t have to continue in the sin. Verse 11 says “And such were some of you.” The homosexuals say, “God made us this way” and contend this allows them to equate their movement to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. But the crippling flaw in this line of thought is: Whereas there are some former homosexuals, there are no former African Americans. It is also worth noting that this passage teaches that homosexuality has no more place in the life of the Christian than fornication (all other forms of sexual sin), idolatry, adultery (the specific sexual sin of cheating on a spouse), theft, covetousness, drunkenness, reviling, or extortion.
8. 1 Timothy 1:8-10: The category “sodomites” (N.K.J.V.) or “them that defile themselves with mankind” (K.J.V.) refers to homosexuals. These verses place the homosexual on the same level as: the lawless, the insubordinate, the ungodly, the sinful, the unholy, the profane, the murderer of a father or a mother, the manslayer, the fornicator, the kidnapper, the perjurer, and anyone else who is contrary to sound doctrine.
Okay, if you are still reading, and your mind is open to the truth, you should now be in agreement with me that the Bible condemns homosexuality and lesbianism (and by implication transgenderism) as sin. It really is an open-and-shut case. But would you believe that some homosexuals try to employ the words of Jesus in their attempts to get out from under the Bible’s obvious teaching? These people say, “If God condemns homosexuality so much, why didn’t Jesus specifically preach against it?” This question is easily answered in the following ways.
Answer #1: In Luke 17:28-37, Jesus used the fire-and-brimstone judgment by which God leveled the city of Sodom as an illustration of the judgment this world will endure before He comes in His Second Coming to walk this earth again. Clearly, Jesus saw no need to apologize for the judgment upon Sodom, which was a judgment against Sodom’s rampant homosexuality (Genesis 19:1-28; Jude 1:5-7).
Answer #2: Jesus didn’t specifically preach against rape, spousal abuse, child abuse, pedophilia, or genocide, either. It’s safe to say, though, that He was against such acts.
Answer #3: Jesus did say, “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill” (Matthew 5:17). This is significant because in three passages (Leviticus 18:22; 20:13; Deuteronomy 23:17) the Old Testament law condemned homosexuality. Similarly, the Old Testament prophet Isaiah negatively called the sinful people of Israel “rulers of Sodom” and “people of Gomorrah” (Isaiah 1:10), and Ezekiel spoke of the “abomination” and “lewdness” of Sodom (Ezekiel 16:44-59).
Answer #4: Jesus confirmed and reiterated the Adam-and-Eve standard of marriage between a man and a woman (Matthew 19:4-6). Consequently, by painting the Adam-and-Eve kind of marriage in such a positive light, He painted any other type of marriage in a negative light.
Now let me mention another route certain homosexuals take in their useless efforts to align their sin with the Bible. They quote Christ’s words, “Judge not that you be not judged” (Matthew 7:1) as if this passage is some kind of trump card that muzzles Bible believers from speaking against homosexuality. Really, though, this argument is just another one that doesn’t make honest sense.
I say this because it is obvious to anyone who studies the verses following Matthew 7:1 that Jesus isn’t forbidding any and all types of judging. (For that matter, He even advocates righteous judging in Luke 12:57 and John 7:24). No, what He is forbidding in Matthew 7:1 is hypocritical judging. He illustrates His point by saying, “If you have a plank (a large piece of wood) in your eye, you have no business criticizing someone else for having a speck (a small piece of wood) in his eye.” Then He says, “Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5).
To apply this teaching to my own life, if I am a homosexual who unashamedly engages in homosexual sex every night, it is wrong for me to stand in my pulpit and preach against someone I know to be a closet homosexual. It is only when I have removed the plank from my own eye (repented of my prolific homosexuality) that I can help that closet homosexual remove the speck from his eye (repent of his lesser homosexuality). Please notice, though, that Jesus taught that the goal in each situation is the repentance of the sin, the removal of the plank or speck.
Someone says, “But Russell, why are you singling out homosexuals for a blog post? There are, after all, other sexual sins.” Well, as far as I know, those who engage in premarital sex, adultery, incest, or bestiality haven’t banded together to force people to accept their sinful lifestyles. When that happens, I’ll write blog posts about their sins.
Furthermore, we Bible-believing Christians must fight this fight because we don’t want to be lumped in with those who “delight in the perversity of the wicked” (Proverbs 3:14). Instead, we want to learn from David’s experience, the one he describes in Psalm 39:1-3. There, he talks about how he tried to restrain his mouth with a muzzle and remain mute with silence while the wicked were before him, but his silence only stirred up sorrow inside him. Finally, when the fire within him reached a point whereby he could no longer keep quiet in the midst of obvious sins, he spoke out against those sins.
In closing, please hear me when I say that God loves homosexuals. He loves them so much that Jesus (God the Son) died on a Roman cross as the potential payment for all their sins, including the sin of homosexuality. But God loves homosexuals too much to leave them in their state of rebellion against Him. That’s why He calls their sin what it is and demands that they repent of it. This isn’t the message they want to hear, of course, but it is the only one that accords with the Bible.

Real Help in Understanding the Bible
Every so often someone will ask me to recommend a resource that will help them understand the Bible. This gets into the area of study Bibles, commentaries, reference works, etc. The problem with these resources is that the bad ones cost as much as the good ones. So, I thought I’d use today’s post to name some good ones.
Before I begin, though, let me offer a few qualifying remarks. First, I believe the books of the Bible, as they were originally written by men who were inspired by God, were perfect, infallible, and authoritative. They were nothing less than God’s written words to the human race. Second, I believe the copying process that left us with a great number of copies (copies of copies of copies of copies, etc.) of those original books was faithful enough and meticulous enough to give us a Bible we can still trust in this 21st century. Third, with only a few exceptions here and there, I believe in interpreting the Bible literally. Fourth, I believe Jesus is going to come to earth’s sky to claim His people by way of the Rapture before the seven-year tribulation period this earth is prophesied to undergo. Fifth, I believe Jesus is going to walk this earth again seven years later at the end of that tribulation period when He comes for His Second Coming. At that time, He will establish his literal 1,000-year reign upon the earth.
I’m telling you what I believe about the Bible and what I believe about the Rapture, Christ’s Second Coming, and Christ’s 1,000-year reign because the study Bibles, commentaries, and reference works I recommend all align with these views. You see, what you believe affects what resources you prefer. For example, while I can get some use from a commentary on the book of The Revelation that holds to a post-tribulation-period Rapture interpretation, I’m not going to enjoy or recommend that commentary nearly as much as I will one that employs a pre-tribulation-period Rapture interpretation. Do you understand?
Finally, let me say I am old enough to have started studying the Bible in an era that was before the internet, personal computers, and cellphones. That means I started out by holding literal books in my hands whenever I was studying the Bible. I’ve never gotten over that, which means I am quite out of step with the younger folks today who only know how to receive information by way of some type of screen. Nevertheless, with that understood, let’s get down to business.
Study Bibles (listed in no particular order):
1. The MacArthur Study Bible: The commentary notes per page in this Bible are numerous and excellent. Also, at the beginning of each book, MacArthur’s identifies the book’s: title, author, date, background, setting, historical themes, theological themes, and interpretive challenges. This information is simply awesome. The only negative thing I can say is that MacArthur is a staunch Calvinist and there are a few places, especially in the New Testament, where his Calvinism, in my opinion, adversely affects his interpretations. But if you can ease around these places, this study Bible is great. I have the New King James Version of this Bible, but MacArthur also offers it in the New American Standard Version, the New International Version, and the English Standard Version.
2. Nelson’s Study Bible: This study Bible has as many commentary notes per page as you will find in any study Bible, and they are wonderfully helpful. It also features many in-depth articles, charts, and word studies. I have the New King James Version of this Bible, but Nelson also offers it in the classic King James Version.
3. NLT Study Bible: The initials “NLT” stand for New Living Translation. My son Royce didn’t like reading the King James Version of the Bible because he said he couldn’t understand what he was reading. So, I bought him a NLT Study Bible for Christmas one year and almost overnight he became a devout reader of scripture. Not only does the New Living Translation text make for easier reading than other translations, this Bible is absolutely chocked full of commentary notes at the bottom of each page. At the beginning of each book, it also features an extensive section that identifies the author of the book, describes the book’s setting, summarizes the book, and explains the book’s meaning and message.
4. The Ryrie Study Bible: For many years, Charles Ryrie served on staff at Dallas Theological Seminary and in the process became a legend as a Bible teacher. The commentary notes in his study Bible are excellent, but there aren’t quite as many of them as there are in those first three study Bibles I’ve listed. With that said, though, I’m always interested in what Ryrie has to say about any passages he chooses to address. I have the New International Version of this Bible, but Ryrie also offers it in the King James Version, the New American Standard Version, and the English Standard Version.
5. The Jeremiah Study Bible: This is the study Bible put together by the popular pastor and author, David Jeremiah. As is the case with the Ryrie Study Bible, the commentary notes offered in this Bible are solid but there just aren’t as many of them per page as there are in other study Bibles. I have the English Standard Version of this Bible, but Jeremiah also offers it in the New King James Version and the New International Version.
6. The Tony Evans Study Bible: Another popular pastor and author is Tony Evans. The number of commentary notes in his study Bible are pretty much on par with the number in The Ryrie Study Bible and The Jeremiah Study Bible, but they are different in that many of them are written in a conversational style that sounds more like Evans as a preacher than a scholar. To me, that is a good thing because he is one of the best preachers I’ve ever heard. I have the Christian Standard Bible version of this Bible, but Evans also offers it in the New American Standard Version.
7. The Scofield Study Bible, The New Scofield Study Bible, The Scofield Study Bible III: I’ve listed these three study Bibles together because they all come under the heading “The Scofield Study Bible.” This is the study Bible that basically invented the whole market of study Bibles. The original version of The Scofield Study Bible first appeared in 1909, but the most popular edition of it is the revised 1917 one. Both the 1909 and 1917 editions were edited by C.I. Scofield and were only offered in the King James Version. Therefore, I have this study Bible in the King James Version.
Overall, the 1917 edition of The Scofield Study Bible provided relatively few commentary notes per page, but the notes it did provide would heavily influence conservative preachers for decades to follow. Most famously (or infamously, depending upon your point of view), The Scofield Study Bible taught: (A.) There are 7 distinct eras (Dispensations) to God’s working in human history. This led to the popular use of the term “Dispensationalism.” (B.) Christ’s Millennial (1,000 years) reign upon the earth will be literal and will be preceded by His Second Coming. This led to the popular use of the term “Premillennialism.” (C.) There is an eons-long gap of time between Genesis 1:1-2 that was the result of God’s original Genesis 1:1 creation becoming ruined by the fall of Satan. Consequently, beginning with Genesis 1:3, God began the process of recreating His ruined creation. This interpretation led to the popular use of the term “The Gap Theory.”
In 1967, a committee was put together to update The Scofield Study Bible, thus creating The New Scofield Study Bible. This version kept many of C.I. Scofield’s original teachings in place but also provided certain other possible interpretations to some of his most controversial teachings, such as The Gap Theory. The 1967 version added more maps and illustrations as well and featured references to archaeological finds that were more current than the ones mentioned in the 1917 edition. The New Scofield Bible was offered in the King James Version and the New American Standard Version. I have it in the New American Standard Version.
In 2008, The Scofield Study Bible III was published. It was edited by Doris White Harris. While still retaining many of C.I. Scofield’s original study notes and his basic framework of a Dispensational view of human history, this update featured more up-to-date archaeological finds, more current and expanded maps, and an even more balanced approach to Scofield’s original teachings. This version is offered in the King James Version, the New King James Version, the New American Standard Version, the New International Version, and the English Standard Version. I myself do not have a copy of this third edition.
Commentaries That Cover the Whole Bible (listed in no particular order):
1. William MacDonald’s Believer’s Bible Commentary. William MacDonald taught at Emmaus Bible College from 1947 until 1965 and served as the President of the school from 1959 until 1965. He then began an extensive career as a Bible teacher and Christian writer. His commentary is probably my favorite of all the one-volume commentaries I have. It is based on the text of the New King James Version.
2. The Moody Bible Commentary: If the Believer’s Bible Commentary isn’t my favorite one-volume commentary, this one is. It was written by some of the faculty members of Moody Bible Institute and is incredibly thorough. I especially like the fact that this commentary not only frequently provides multiple potential interpretations of difficult-to-interpret passages, it usually lets the reader know which interpretation it prefers. Even if I don’t agree with the given conclusion, I appreciate the whole approach. This commentary is based on the text of The New American Standard Version.
3. The Bible Knowledge Commentary: This two-volume set was written by some of the faculty of Dallas Theological Seminary, and both volumes are superb. In particular, their scores of charts and diagrams such as “An Overview of Old Testament History”; “Chronology of the Flood”; “Plan of Solomon’s Temple”; “Jesus’ Six Trials”; “Harmony of Events of Jesus’ Crucifixion”; “Sermons & Speeches in Acts”; etc. are great. They are the best such things I’ve ever seen anywhere. Both volumes of The Bible Knowledge Commentary are based on the text of the New International Version.
4. The Bible Exposition Commentary: This six-volume set was written by Warren Wiersbe, the popular pastor, preacher, and author. For years, Wiersbe wrote the little “Be” books: “Be Delivered” (Exodus); “Be Skillful” (Proverbs); “Be Right” (Romans); “”Be Victorious” (Revelation); etc. The “Be” books can still be purchased individually, but now they’ve all been compiled into this six-volume set. Wiersbe uses multiple translations in offering his commentary remarks, and anything he writes is well worth reading. Putting it simply, I’ve never heard or read a better teacher of scripture than Warren Wiersbe.
5. The MacArthur Bible Commentary: This one-volume commentary provides all the excellent information of The MacArthur Study Bible and much more. Whereas MacArthur is provided limited space per page for his commentary remarks in his study Bible, his one-volume commentary affords him much more space to offer much more commentary. That’s why, if I had to choose between purchasing his study Bible or his one-volume commentary, I would purchase the commentary. It is based on the text of the New King James Version.
6. The King James Bible Commentary: Most of the writers who helped compile this commentary were on the faculty of Liberty University/Seminary, but there are some contributors from other seminaries. Anytime I use this commentary I find it helpful, and it’s the commentary I tend to recommend for anyone who prefers to exclusively use the King James Version to do their Bible studying. As the commentary’s title suggests, it is based on the text of the King James Version.
7. The Baker Commentary on the Bible: This one-volume commentary was edited for Baker Books by Walter A. Elwell, the well-known Christian scholar who taught at Wheaton College from 1975 to 2003. This commentary is not quite as conservative as the other ones I’ve listed, but what I like the most about it is that I find helpful material in it that I simply do not find in any other commentary. It is based on the text of the New International Version.
Other Helpful Resources (listed in no particular order):
1. Charles Ryrie’s Basic Theology: This is a wonderful easy-to-read book on Bible doctrine.
2. Steven Waterhouse’s Not By Bread Alone: This is an outlined guide to doctrine that offers a ton of good information on just about every Bible topic. It is actually more thorough and extensive than Charles Ryrie’s Basic Theology.
3. Nave’s Topical Bible: When you are trying to locate all the relevant passages on a specific topic in the Bible, this book is a must.
4. Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible: If you know one word from a certain verse and want to locate that verse, this is the book you grab. It also gives definitions for the Hebrew words of the Old Testament and the Greek words of the New Testament.
5. Adrian Rogers’ What Every Christian Ought To Know: This book does a wonderful job of covering the basics of living the Christian life. For example, some of the chapters are: “Every Christian Ought to Know the Bible Is the Word of God”; “Every Christian Ought to Know the Assurance of Salvation”; “Every Christian Ought to Know How to Handle Temptation”; “Every Christian Ought to Know How to Discern the Will of God”; and “Every Christian Ought to Know How to Discover His Spiritual Gift.”
6. Ray Stedman’s Adventuring Through the Bible: This one-volume book describes itself as “A Comprehensive Guide to the Entire Bible,” and it really does back up that claim. It is not a commentary in the classic sense of that word, and it certainly doesn’t use a verse-by-verse approach to explain scripture. What it does do, though, is provide the reader with an overview of each book of the Bible and cut into quite a bit of the “meat” of each book.
7. Richards Complete Bible Dictionary: Every student of the Bible needs a good Bible dictionary. I myself have no less than five of them, and I suppose this one is the best of the five. Let me say, however, that there are many excellent Bible dictionaries on the market. Some other good ones are: The Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary; The Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary; Easton’s Bible Dictionary; and Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Dictionary. It’s hard to go wrong with any of these (or others than could be named).
8. Halley’s Bible Handbook and Wilmington’s Guide to the Bible: Neither of these little books is a true commentary, but each one gives a lot of “bang for the buck” by relaying a wealth of information about the Bible.
9. David Jeremiah’s God In You: This is the best book I’ve ever seen on the topic of the Holy Spirit.
10. John MacArthur’s Charismatic Chaos: If you wondering about speaking in tongues, healing, signs and wonders, the “health and wealth” gospel, and “prosperity preachers,” this book is the gold standard that exposes the outright fraud that passes for a lot of “religion” these days.
11. Tim Lahaye’s Revelation Unveiled: Everybody is fascinated by the book of The Revelation, and I have dozens of good commentaries on the book. To me, though, this commentary does the simplest, best job of explaining the book.
12. Walter Martin’s The Kingdom of the Cults and the Josh McDowell-Don Stewart book Handbook of Today’s Religions. Each of these books does a fantastic job of naming religions other than Christianity and explaining how they differ from Christianity.
Well, I’ll stop here, but please understand I’m not claiming to have done any kind of thorough job on this topic. Just because a study Bible, commentary, or other type of resource isn’t on my list, don’t automatically take that to mean I wouldn’t recommend it. This post has simply been my attempt to offer a relatively brief list of some of the books that sit on the shelves of my study and have helped me over the years. Since the prices on each of these is very reasonable considering what they will give you in return, what are you waiting for? If you really want to understand the Bible, all this help is readily available. Pretty much whatever I know about the Bible, I learned from these books and others like them, and you can as well if you will put in the effort.