Resolution or Repentance?

Little Johnny’s mother plainly told him not to eat any cookies before supper. As soon as her back was turned, though, Johnny ate some cookies. When the mother discovered what he had done, she asked him, “Didn’t you know it was wrong to eat those cookies?” Johnny answered, “Yes, mamma, and the whole time I was eating them, I was asking God to forgive me.”

Sadly, this story sums up how many of us — including many of us Christians — deal with our sinful conduct. We keep on sinning and keep asking God to forgive us. Over and over again the pattern repeats itself: sin – ask for forgiveness – sin – ask for forgiveness – sin – ask for forgiveness. It’s like we’re stuck in a loop, one that will never result in any real change.

Genuine repentance, on the other hand, is much more serious. The Greek verb that gets translated as “repent” in our English translations of the Bible is metanoeo. Interestingly, this verb doesn’t primarily involve actions. Any change in action only comes at the end of the process. First and foremost, the verb involves the mind. In his Word Studies in the New Testament, Greek scholar Marvin Vincent explains that metanoeo is the combination of a preposition that means “after” or “with” alongside a verb that means “to perceive.” Thus, he says, “…the whole compound means to think differently after.” We find this same basic definition in Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, which defines “repent” as “to perceive afterwards.”

The point is that there is a distinct process that works itself out in regards to repentance. First, you commit the sin, either once or a hundred times. Second, somewhere along the line after you have committed the sin, you realize that what you did was wrong and you are actually sorry that you did it. Your sorrow shows that you are now thinking differently about the sin and see the sin as a problem. Third, now that your thinking has changed concerning the sin, you have the inner motivation necessary to stop committing the sin.

By understanding this process, you can understand why repentance has been defined as “a change of mind that leads to a change of action.” Also, you can understand why the apostle Paul said, “For godly sorrow produces repentance…” (2 Corinthians 7:10, N.K.J.V.). Admittedly, the specific context for those words from Paul has to do with the salvation, but the link between feeling sorry for your sin and repenting of that sin always applies.

This explains why high-pressure tactics, threats, and even emotional pleas don’t produce repentance that lasts. If someone badgers, threatens, or begs you enough to get you to stop committing a particular sin, but deep inside your mind you don’t feel sorry for having committed the sin in the first place, you will almost certainly eventually return to the sin. Why? It’s because your repentance was not produced by a change of mind and what Paul calls “godly sorrow.”

I’ve always loved that illustration about the little boy who was told to sit down but wouldn’t. Finally, his mother walked over to him and manhandled him by picking him up and plopping him down into a chair. As the little fellow sat there stewing, he said, “I may be sitting down on the outside, but I’m standing up on the inside!” That, my friend, is why so much so-called “repentance” doesn’t last in our lives. Even as we are outwardly doing the right thing about the sin, inwardly we are still thinking wrongly about it. We are rationalizing it, minimizing it, or attempting to explain it away. Like that little boy, we are still standing up on the inside, mentally. And what will that mean in the long run? It will mean that at some point, sooner or later, we will run back to the sin. It’s virtually inevitable.

Therefore, as we begin this New Year let me say that repentance is infinitely better than resolution. While resolutions are typically barely skin deep, repentance goes way deep, penetrating even to the inner recesses of the mind. Accordingly, show me a person who says, ‘I’ve got to change my way of doing,” and I’ll show you a person whose attempts to stop committing his pet sin won’t go the distance. On the other hand, show me a person who says, “I’ve got to change my way of thinking,” and I’ll show you a person who has an honest-to-goodness chance of laying a pet sin in the dust once and for all. You see, the battleground is the mind, not the body. If you can get the mind turned around, the body will naturally follow.

Posted in Backsliding, Change, New Year, Repentance, Sin | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Year-End Report (2019)

The Disciples Road is hosted by Word Press, and Word Press does an excellent job of providing in-depth statistical analysis for the blog. Anytime, night or day, I can click on “Stats and Insights” and get all kinds of information regarding the blog’s views for the day, the week, the month, the year, or all time. I can find out which posts are being viewed the most, which referrers (Search Engines, Facebook, Twitter, etc.)  are bringing people to the blog site, which countries are reporting views, and a whole lot of other info that I don’t even need. Needless to say, Word Press makes it easy for me to provide a year-end report regarding what’s going on with the blog.

And just exactly what is going on? Well, it’s all good. For the first time since I began the blog in 2009, the total views for the year exceeded 40,000. Right now they stand at just under 45,000, and that’s with most of a day to go. That breaks the previous year’s record, last year’s 36,830, by over 8,000 views. When the final numbers are posted, the end result will be a betterment of approximately 700 views per month.

November’s 5,182 views and average of 173 views per day made that month the year’s best in terms of views. October’s 4,878 views and average of 157 views per day ranked second in both categories. The fact that these months fall late in the year indicate that the blog’s views are trending upward. Admittedly, December’s views fell back to just under 4,000, but December — with everything that goes on that month — always sees a decrease in views.

While a blog’s number of views typically serves as the primary indicator in regards to readership, the number of visitors to the site is a big deal as well. Just by way of a reminder, one person visiting the site registers as one visitor, but if that person views two posts the number of views comes in at two. For 2019, 27,190 people visited the blog, and the average number of views per visitor was 1.65. Both of those were increases from 2018’s 23,260 visitors and 1.58 average number of views per visitor.

As for the posts that received the most views this year, there were some changes from the 2018 list. For each of the past several years, Does God Want Everyone to Get Married? has held the top spot as the most viewed post, but this year it fell to #3 with a current total number of views of 1,724 for the year. Ahead of it on the list were What a Bird’s Nest Can Teach Us About God’s Will (currently at 1,756 views for the year) and The 10 Times Israel Tested God (currently at 3,713 views for the year).

Those 3,713 views for The 10 Times Israel Tested God were an increase of over 2,500 views from that post’s 1,151 views last year. Did I see that coming? No way. When I wrote that post in 2018, I never dreamed that it would do much more than get its share of views as the new post on the site and then fade into obscurity as I wrote more posts to push it further down the list of the latest posts. Boy, was I wrong.

Anyway, here are the top 10 most viewed posts for 2019:

  1. The 10 Times Israel Tested God (3,713 views)
  2. What a Bird’s Nest Can Teach Us About God’s Will (1,756 views)
  3. Does God Want Everyone to Get Married? (1,724 views)
  4. How Does a Worm Get Inside an Apple? (1,380 views)
  5. How Would You Describe Your Walk With the Lord These Days? (1,111 views)
  6. “Lord, Why am I Having to Wait?” (863 views)
  7. Lessons From Habakkuk (800 views)
  8. What Satan Did to Joshua: Accusation (613 views)
  9. About the Author & the Blog (546 views)
  10. The Importance of Spanking a Child (380 views)

It’s significant that the bottom 5 posts on that list are different from last year’s bottom 5 of: What Will Life Be Like in Christ’s Millennial Reign?; Should We Pray Silently to Keep Satan From Hearing?; Why God Hates Gambling; The Old Testament’s General Teaching on Prayer; and the Mayonnaise Jar. That indicates that the site is getting even more healthy as a wider selection of posts are finding increased traction with readers. In other words, the site’s numbers aren’t just being driven by two or three popular posts.

Here now is the updated list of the posts that have been viewed the most all time on the site. That list currently reads as follows:

  1. Does God Want Everyone to Get Married? (17,860 views)
  2. How Does a Worm Get Inside an Apple? (7,461 views)
  3. The 10 Times Israel Tested God (4,862 views)
  4. What a Bird’s Nest Can Teach Us About God’s Will (4,495 views)
  5. Oral Roberts & “Seed Faith” Giving (2,079 views)
  6. How Would You Describe Your Walk With the Lord These Days? (1,193 views)
  7. What Does the Bible Teach About Divorce & Remarriage? (1,857 views)
  8. The Importance of Spanking a Child (1,530 views)
  9. Should We Pray Silently to Keep Satan From Hearing? (1,528 views)
  10. The Importance of Individuality in a Child (1,354 views)

Now let me say a word about how God is using the blog around the world. In 2018, the blog registered at least one view from 174 different countries, and this year’s number matched that number perfectly. 2019’s top-10 list of countries that registered views for the site currently reads like this:

  1. United States (32,227 views for 2019) (134,734 views all time, #1)
  2. India (1,437 views) (3,319 views all time, #5)
  3. South Africa (1,302 views) (3,735 views all time, #4)
  4. United Kingdom (1,310 views) (5,129 views all time, #2)
  5. Canada (1,105 views) (4,612 views all time, #3)
  6. Nigeria (938 views) (2,322 views all time, #8)
  7. Philippines (898 views) (2,947 views all time, #7)
  8. Australia (607 views) (2,958 views all time, #6)
  9. Kenya (531 views) (1,136 views all time, #10)
  10. Singapore (390 views) (1,329 all-time views, #9 all time)

In closing, about all I can say is “THANK YOU” to each one of you out there who has ever registered a view on the blog. And for those of you who are regular readers, I hope it goes without saying that you have my undying appreciation. Many of you I know personally. Others of you I’ve never met. Either way, though, without you this blog’s scope and influence would be a shell of what it is. As you’ve probably noticed, I don’t allow any advertisements on the blog. (If you see one, I didn’t put it there.) Also, I don’t promote the blog other than sharing a short paragraph on Facebook or Twitter whenever I publish a new post. That means that much of the work to grow the readership comes from God using word of mouth.

As always, I have no plan concerning the blog. I just write new posts, on average three per week, and launch them out onto the internet. I have no agenda, no long-range goals, no plans to rule the world. My entire approach is simply to write what God lays on my heart to write. I’m pretty good at grammar and punctuation, but a true expert could find enough errors to hurt my feelings. And typos? Let’s just say they come with the territory.

In the end, though, I trust that you can hear my heart by reading my words. Even more than that, I want the Lord to use my stuff to help you not only learn the Bible but also learn how to better walk with Him and serve Him. As I’ve explained before, the word “disciple” literally means “learner,” and that’s why the blog is called The DISCIPLE’S Road. I myself am still learning, and so when I write about a topic, that is me writing myself clear about that topic. You, the reader, receive the overflow, and hopefully that overflow is a help to you. That’s how this blog thing has been working and how it will continue to work.

So, as we stare down the gun barrel of 2020, my prayer is that God will continue to use this blog in great and mighty ways, and that each person who clicks on the site will be genuinely blessed by doing so. If you want to pray something for me, please pray that I’ll be encouraged in the work. In case you don’t know, life is hard and serving Jesus can make it harder because it puts you on the radar screen of the devil and his demons. That’s why it’s so encouraging to read a year-end report like the 2019 one for the blog. For that, again I say, “Thank You.” I really don’t have the words to adequately express the full measure of my appreciation, but just know that the measure is plenty deep and plenty wide.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , | 6 Comments

How to Hurt Your Best Friend

Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. Or do you think that the Scripture says in vain, “The Spirit who dwells in us yearns jealously?” (James 4:4-5, N.K.J.V.)

What could possibly make God the Holy Spirit, who dwells inside each Christian, become nothing less than jealous? According to our text, it happens when the Christian chooses to be a friend to the world rather than a friend to God. Like a spurned friend, the indwelling Holy Spirit reaches the point of jealousy in His yearning to have that Christian back as a friend.

The old King James Version translates verse 5 by saying the Spirit “lusteth to envy.” The idea is that the Spirit lusts for (passionately longs for) the friendship the world has with the Christian. Putting it another way, the Spirit envies the relationship the world has with the Christian. He wishes the Christian felt about Him the way he or she feels about the world.

Kenneth Wuest, in his Untranslatable Riches From the Greek New Testament, describes the situation this way:

The indwelling Holy Spirit possessing all the potential power and help a saint needs, has a passionate desire to the point of envy. Of what is He envious, and what does He passionately desire? The context makes this clear. James is speaking here of adulterers and adulteresses in a spiritual sense. Christians who were not living in separation from the world and unto God. They had committed spiritual adultery in playing false to their Lord and in fellowshipping with the world. They were allowing their evil natures to control them, those evil natures from which they had been delivered when God saved them. The Holy Spirit is envious of any control which that fallen nature might have over the believer, and passionately desirous of Himself controlling his thoughts, words, and deeds.

You see, anytime the Christian reverts back to his or her former friendship with the world, the indwelling Holy Spirit actually gets His feelings hurt. He’s pained that the Christian would voluntarily choose the world’s friendship over His friendship. A similar passage is Ephesians 4:30, which says the Spirit can be grieved.

Christian, imagine that you and God the Holy Spirit are sitting together on the couch in your living room. You are talking, laughing, and enjoying each other’s company. Then suddenly your phone rings. It’s your old friend the world calling. He’s just pulled into your driveway and wants you to hit the road with him for an adventure. The only stipulation is that your friend the Spirit isn’t invited. As you know, the world and the Spirit intensely dislike — the relationship might best be described as hate — each other. Truth be told, they are rivals, and so if you want to roll with the world, you’ll have to leave the Spirit behind. Besides, the world’s car is a Corvette that only has two seats, just enough room for you and him.

And so what do you do? You hang up the phone, abruptly tell the Spirit you’ve got to go, race out the door, and jump in the car with the world. And what does the Spirit do? He gets up from the couch, walks over to the window, and watches as you and the world tear out of the driveway together. That’s when that strange mix of hurting, grieving, yearning, envying, and being flat out jealous begins inside Him as His best friend has callously, flippantly, insensitively chosen His rival over Him. That is the situation James 4:4-5 is describing.

Actually, we can stretch the analogy even further. Since the Holy Spirit literally dwells inside the Christian’s body and never leaves, we can envision the Spirit being forced to tag along as the Christian has his or her time with the world. I guess the Spirit can ride in the trunk. Of course, no one riding in a car trunk has any control over where the car goes or what the driver and passenger(s) do. 1 Thessalonians 5:19 describes this as quenching the Spirit.

You should think about all this, Christian, the next time the world calls and wants to come between you and the friendship you have with the indwelling Holy Spirit. As I’ve tried to illustrate in this post, you must understand that the Holy Spirit is a person, not an “it.” He is every bit as much a person as God the Father or Jesus, and as such He has feelings. Yes, He can even get jealous, red-hot jealous, and does so each time you choose the world over Him. Because of this, you must always be on guard against that enticing phone call and that Corvette sitting in your driveway with the motor running. For one thing, that’s not a trip that will ever be in your best interests. And for another, you’ll have to deeply hurt your best friend in order to take it.

Posted in Backsliding, Disobedience, Holiness, Jealousy, Personal Holiness, Rebellion, Sanctification, Separation, Sin, Temptation, The Holy Spirit | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

A Little Church Humor for the Day After Christmas

Because I’m pretty much fried — in body and brain — from a month’s worth of all things Christmas, I thought it would be nice if I let others do the writing today. A good friend of mine sent me a couple of pages of jokes a while back, and I’m just going to pull out some of my favorites and share them with you. Enjoy.

*A Sunday School teacher challenged her children to take some time on Sunday afternoon to write a letter to God. They were to bring their letters to class the following Sunday. One little boy wrote, “Dear God, We had a good time at church today. Wish you could have been there.”

*Another Sunday School teacher was teaching her young students about Noah and the Ark. When she asked them what they thought Noah did to pass the time aboard the Ark, she got no reply. Finally, she remembered that there weren’t any fish in the Ark and said, “Maybe he did a lot of fishing.” To that, one little boy gave her a funny look and said, “I don’t think so. It’s kinda hard to fish with just two worms.”

*One man said to another man at a gathering, “I’ve been racking my brain, but I can’t seem to place you. But you do look like someone I’ve seen a lot, someone I don’t particularly like. But I can’t tell you why. Isn’t that strange?” “There’s nothing strange about it,” said the other man. “You have seen me a lot, and I know exactly why you resent me. For two years I passed the collection plate in your church.”

*The church service was over, and the pastor stood at the door shaking hands with the people as they left. A woman shook his hand and said, “You know what? I don’t think I’ll come back to this church any more. Every time I come you people sing the same two songs. You either sing Silent Night or He Arose.” (Get it?)

*Deer-hunting season began one Saturday. The next day, at the close of the Sunday morning service, a pastor said to his congregation, “Raise your hand if you bagged a deer yesterday.” Not one hand was lifted. Puzzled, the pastor said, “I don’t understand this. I know that many of you went hunting yesterday, and I specifically asked God to bless your deer.” After a brief pause, one hunter replied, “Well, preacher, He did. They’re all safe. Next time, ask Him to bless our aim.”

*(Here’s one that is particularly relevant to this time of year.) The following conversation occurred when an IRS agent visited a pastor:

  • agent: “Pastor, do you know a Mr. Karten?”
  • pastor: “Yes, I do.”
  • agent: “Is he a member of your congregation?”
  • pastor: “Yes, he is.”
  • agent: “And did Mr. Karten really donate $100,000 to your church, as he has claimed on his tax return?”
  • pastor: “I assure you he will!”
Posted in Church, Giving, Humor, Sunday School | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Christian Verses” Podcast: Isaiah 7:14

Merry Christmas everybody! A couple of weeks ago I preached a sermon on Christ’s virgin birth. Along about the same time Malcolm taught a class on the topic. So, we decided to pool our efforts and devote a podcast to the topic. In the podcast, Malcolm gets things going by quoting some interesting statistics regarding professing Christians’ belief (or lack of it) in the virgin birth. Then we go from there to delve deeper into the discussion. To hear the podcast, just click on the link below. And, again, MERRY CHRISTMAS!

https://soundcloud.com/user-185243867/the-essential-virgin-birthcv2019015

Posted in "Christian Verses" podcast, Christ's Birth, Christmas, Virgin Birth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Your Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series (post #7)

That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (John 1:9-13, N.K.J.V.)

In regards to the news of Christ’s birth, you can talk all you want about the reactions of Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, the wise men, Herod, and the Jewish religious leaders. In the end, though, the only reaction that gets into your wheelhouse is your reaction. Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the wise men all reacted appropriately to Jesus becoming flesh and dwelling among men, while Herod and the Jewish religious leaders reacted inappropriately to that incarnation. But what about you? How have you reacted to it?

Even more importantly than how you have reacted to the news of Christ’s birth is the matter of how you have reacted to the news that He: grew up, lived a sinless life, performed miracles that proved His divinity, died on a Roman cross as the sacrifice for your sins, arose from the dead, ascended back to heaven, and right now offers salvation to you if you will (as our text passage says) receive Him as your personal Savior. Obviously, that sweet little baby in the manger didn’t stay an infant and didn’t stay in that manger. No, He became an adult who did business with the human race, and now the human race must do business with Him one way or the other by either receiving Him or rejecting Him.

This idea of receiving Jesus goes hand in hand with the Bible’s teaching that salvation is a gift that can only be received or rejected. Consider the following passages (all from the N.K.J.V.):

  • For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 6:23)
  • For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works lest anyone should boast. (Ephesians 2:8-9)
  • Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift! (2 Corinthians 9:15)

You see, the Bible so inseparably links Jesus with the gift of salvation that the two become one and the same. The only way to receive the gift is to receive Jesus. As evidence of this, think about John 3:16. That verse teaches that God loved the world so much that He gave it a gift. But what was that gift? It was a person: God’s Son, Jesus. Similarly, in John 4:10, Jesus tells a Samaritan woman, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water” (N.K.J.V.). Do you see how the “living water” (a description of salvation) and Jesus are the same? The only way the woman could receive the living water was for her to receive Jesus.

Actually, the Bible uses various terminologies to describe how a person gets saved. Many passages talk about believing in Jesus (John 3:16, Romans 10:14, etc.), but other passages talk about putting faith in Him (Romans 3:21-31, Colossians 1:3-5, etc.), trusting in Him (Ephesians 1:11-14, 1 Timothy 4:10), calling upon Him (Romans 10:9-13), or coming to Him (John 5:39-40, John 6:35-37). Revelation 3:20 even describes it as opening the door after hearing Jesus knock.

It’s not that these passages are describing different types of salvation experiences. The point is that the genuine salvation experience will incorporate all of these descriptions. This brings us back to the terminology of our text passage. What does it mean for a person to receive Jesus? It means, in regards to salvation, that the person believes in Him, puts faith in Him, trusts in Him, calls upon Him, comes to Him, and opens the door to Him.

This Christmas, or any other time of the year for that matter, you need to make sure that you have truly received the gift of salvation that is Jesus Christ. Personally, whenever I present the gospel, I usually use the words “believe in Him” in reference to what the individual needs to do concerning Jesus. I favor this terminology because it’s the one most frequently used in the New Testament. As I’ve pointed out, though, any of the terminologies will work if the decision itself is real. It’s the decision’s authenticity that is paramount, not the specific wording.

But make no mistake, that decision or lack of it is what determines each individual’s eternal destiny. I’m happy to report that all scriptural indications are that Mary, Joseph, those shepherds, and those wise men didn’t just rightly receive the news about Christ’s birth; they also rightly received Him. Again I ask you, have you done this? If you haven’t, then I’m not happy to report that you’ll spend this Christmas abiding under the condemnation of God (John 3:18). But if you have, then you’ll spend it as God means for you to spend it. The choice is yours to make because the gift has already been given to you in the person of Jesus Christ. All that’s left to be decided now is, will you reject the gift or receive it?

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Religious Leaders’ Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #6)

Imagine that you have waited your whole life for John Doe to arrive. When you were a child, your parents told you, “One day John Doe will come to our people, and when He gets here He will solve all our problems.” When you attended school, your teachers told you, “We are waiting for John Doe to arrive, and when He does He will lead our people into an age of peace, prosperity, and prominence in the world.” When you became an adult, other adults told you, “Surely it is almost time for John Doe to finally come and save us.”

Then one day, out of the clear blue, some strangers show up in your city and ask to be shown to the site where John Doe was recently born. How do they know He’s been born? They know it because they’ve seen His sign, a miraculous star, in the nighttime sky. To them, the question is not whether or not John Doe has been born. The only question is, “Where is He?”

Well, you don’t know these strange men, but you do know the answer to their question. According to what you’ve always been taught, John Doe is supposed to be born in Bethlehem. Bethlehem, that’s the little town that is located only about five miles from where you stand. Okay, so what’s your next move?

Based upon what you have been taught your entire life, shouldn’t you be excited about the possibility that John Doe has at last been born? Shouldn’t you be encouraged by the news of His birth? Most importantly, shouldn’t you follow those strange men to Bethlehem? Better yet, shouldn’t you say to them, “Follow me, I’ll show you the way there. I want to see this child myself”? That’s what common sense would dictate you should do with such news.

This brings us to the Jewish ruling elite of Herod’s day. When those wise men from the East showed up at Herod’s palace and asked him about the whereabouts of the newborn king, Herod immediately called in Jerusalem’s chief priests and scribes and asked them for the answer. And they gave it to him by quoting the Micah 5:2 prophecy about Bethlehem. But, after giving that answer, those men simply faded back into the shadows, never to be heard from again (at least as far as the story of Christ’s birth goes).

Isn’t that incredible? Isn’t that shocking? Isn’t that sad? Those Jewish religious leaders weren’t interested enough or even curious enough to make the five-mile trip to at least investigate the validity of the claim. As far as we know, they were content to just return to the “business as usual” of their little world of religion and wait to see if any more was heard about the Messiah being born.

The Bible doesn’t tell us the reason why those men reacted that way. Perhaps they were terrified that Herod would see them get excited about the birth of the Messiah. After all, it’s not like they couldn’t have guessed that he would want to kill the newborn king. On the other hand, perhaps they inwardly hoped that the Messiah hadn’t been born. After all, they knew that if He really was on the scene, He would create a tidal wave that would come crashing down into their comfortable lives and positions of authority among the Jews.

While I don’t doubt that those religious leaders were terrified of Herod’s wrath, it’s impossible for me to believe that their reaction to the news of Christ’s birth didn’t have plenty to do with them potentially losing their lofty status among the Jews. Along these lines, it doesn’t help their case that, some 30 years later, when Jesus began His public ministry, these same groups hounded Him at every turn, tried to discredit Him, and ultimately worked through the Romans to get Him crucified. That tells us all we need to know about how they felt about Him.

In this way, those religious leaders symbolize all the people who won’t embrace Jesus as Savior because they know that doing so will bring major change to their lives. Show me a lost person who really, really, really likes the way his or her life is going, and I’ll show you someone who isn’t a top candidate to come under the Lordship of Christ. Seriously, Christian, if you try to witness to a lost person by saying, “Jesus can give you a new life,” and that person’s comeback is, “But I like the life I have now,” you’re probably not going to win that person to Jesus. That’s just reality.

What many lost people instinctively understand is that Jesus won’t play second fiddle or be a co-pilot. If He gets invited into a life, He’s taking over that life completely. Furthermore, the individual’s personal comfort won’t be nearly as high on Christ’s priority list as it is on the person’s. Yes, Jesus will help the individual in whatever way is needed, but then He’ll start to mold and shape that individual to be used in His service. Unfortunately, most people simply don’t have much interest in that kind of life.

At the bottom line, those Jewish religious leaders saw Jesus as a threat — a threat to their way of life, a threat to their place in society, a threat to their power over the people. It’s no wonder they had no interest in seeing Him. Even if they had traveled with those wise men to Bethlehem, they certainly wouldn’t have joined them in worshiping Him. It’s much more likely they would have ridiculed the idea of the virgin birth and dismissed Jesus as being nothing more than the product of premarital sex between Joseph and Mary.

You know, in many ways, the reaction from those religious leaders was about as bad as Herod’s reaction. The only difference was, they didn’t add in the effort to kill Jesus. But then again, that would come about three decades later, wouldn’t it? For that matter, the chances are that a few of those same chief priests and scribes who first heard the news about Christ’s birth were still alive to play an active role in His death. And if that was indeed the case, it meant that they helped finish what Herod had started. I wonder if they ever noticed the connection. They probably didn’t, did they? That would have required far more spiritual discernment than their warped minds were capable of generating.

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Herod’s Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #5)

When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. (Matthew 2:3-4, N.K.J.V.)

Thus far in our series on the reactions to the news of Christ’s birth, everyone’s reaction has been positive. Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the wise men all responded beautifully to the news. But now we come to a man who got it wrong. Actually, he couldn’t have responded any worse. His name was Herod the Great, and he was a real piece of work.

Once the Roman empire had gained control of the land of Israel, the Romans needed handpicked leaders to rule over it for them. One of those chosen rulers was Antipater, whom Julius Caesar installed as procurator of Judea in 47 B.C. Antipater was from Idumea, which was located in the larger general region of ancient Edom. Edom, of course, was historically famous as the land of Esau, Jacob’s twin brother. Antipater, through his wife Cyprus (who was the daughter of an Arab sheik), fathered Herod, the second of his five sons.

Shortly after being named procurator of Judea, Antipater used his influence to get his oldest son, Phasaelus, appointed the governor of Jerusalem and Herod appointed as the governor of Galilee. Herod was 25 years old at the time. Following the murder of Antipater in 43 B.C., Rome’s Marc Antony appointed Phasaelus and Herod as tetrarchs to rule over the Jews. Following Phasaelus’ death, not to mention a great deal of military and political fighting, Marc Antony named Herod as the sole ruler over the Jews in 37 B.C. Herod then reigned as “king” over the Jews from 37 B.C. until his death in 4 B.C.

Herod wasn’t a pure-blood Jew, but he was half-Idumean, and the Idumeans did practice a nominal version of Judaism. This gave him an understanding of the Jewish people that allowed him to keep them somewhat appeased under his rule. The most prime example of his efforts to win Jewish approval was his massive reworking of the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. Under Herod, that temple was restored, renovated, and outright rebuilt to become even larger and more opulent than Jerusalem’s original temple of Solomon had been. 

Still, we must never forget that Herod was a moral monster. Putting it simply, his god was power and he would do anything to gain it and keep it. All told, he married ten different wives, each one for political purposes, and fathered multiple children through them. By the end of his life, however, in his unceasing efforts to stamp out all rivals and keep his throne secure, he had at various times ordered the executions of one of these wives, her two brothers, and three of these sons. This explains why Caesar Augustus once famously said of Herod, “I’d sooner be Herod’s swine than Herod’s son.”

Keep in mind, now, that Herod was the guy who was ruling over the Jews when those wise men showed up in Jerusalem and asked, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?” Talk about asking the wrong man the wrong question! Herod surely thought, “Wait a minute, I’m the King of the Jews!” As our text says in the K.J.V., the N.K.J.V., the N.A.S.V., and the E.S.V., he was “troubled” (Matthew 2:3). Other translations render his reaction as “disturbed” (N.I.V.), “deeply disturbed” (H.C.S.B., N.L.T.), “alarmed” (N.E.T.), and “frightened” (N.R.S.V.). I think all of these descriptions accurately describe how Herod felt when he first heard the news that a King of the Jews had been born. He certainly wasn’t glad to get the information. Interestingly, he wasn’t mad, either. He was just deeply troubled and more than a little afraid as he instinctively viewed this baby as a major threat to his throne.

Herod’s next move was to summons some of the Jewish priests and scribes to his palace and ask them, “Where is the Christ (Messiah) supposed to be born?” (Mathew 2:4). The fact that Herod knew enough to ask such a question shows that somewhere along the line he had heard about a Messiah who was supposed to come and rule over Israel. That prophecy was, after all, common knowledge among the Jews. And so those priests and scribes didn’t have to race back to the temple and consult their ancient texts to find the answer Herod needed. They knew full well that the prophet Micah had prophesied that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem (Matthew 2:5-6).

Now it was time for Herod to enact his plan to use the wise men in his sinister attempt to execute the newborn king. So, he called them back to him and gave them the answer, “Bethlehem.” Then he added in the lie, “Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him bring word back to me, that I may come and worship Him also” (Matthew 2:8). Like I said, Herod was a real piece of work. He had every intention of letting those good men unwittingly play the role of bounty hunters in his service.

Thankfully, God stepped in and thwarted that plan. Shortly after the wise men found Jesus, presented their gifts to Him, and worshiped Him, God warned them by way of a dream not to report back to Herod. They promptly obeyed those instructions and returned to their homeland by way of a route that didn’t backtrack them through Jerusalem. Furthermore, not long after the wise men had left the little family, an angel appeared to Joseph in a dream and told him, “Arise, take the young Child and His mother, flee to Egypt, and stay there until I bring you word, for Herod will seek the young Child to destroy Him” (Matthew 2:13, N.K.J.V.). Like the wise men, Joseph immediately did as he was told and took the family south into Egypt by night (Matthew 2:14-15), and they remained in Egypt until Herod’s death a short while later.

As for Herod, once he figured out that the wise men weren’t going to return to him, he flew into an absolute rage and issued a decree that every male child two years old or younger in Bethlehem and its surrounding districts should be killed (Matthew 2:16). This heinous act has become known as “the massacre of the innocents.” You might ask, “Why did the decree extend to children up to two years of age?” The Bible leaves no doubt about that answer. Matthew 2:16 says that Herod chose this age “according to the time which he had determined from the wise men.” This kicks back to Matthew 2:7, where we’re told that he “determined from them what time the star appeared.” This leaves us to believe that the star first appeared on the night Jesus was born, and it took the wise men several months — perhaps as long as two years — to arrive in Jerusalem.

Getting back to Herod’s slaughter of those precious children, did you know that even that sadistic crime fulfilled prophecy? The prophecy was from Jeremiah 31:15, and under the inspiration of God Matthew applied it to “the massacre of the innocents” (Matthew 2:17-18). We don’t know how many children died as a result of Herod’s attempt to kill Jesus. Since Bethlehem and its surrounding districts didn’t make for a very large area, there probably weren’t that many children two years old or younger who lived there at that time. Needless to say, though, if there was even one, that was one too many to die because of the insane workings of Herod’s mind.

In closing, let me say that even though Herod the Great is long gone, there are still plenty of people around today who despise the news of Christ’s birth about as much as he did. Satanists certainly don’t get excited about that birth. Neither do atheists and Jews. For that matter, the world’s billions of lost people don’t truly have much to celebrate at Christmas, either. The truth is that one day they will be shocked to find that the babe in the manger has become their eternal Judge and Jury (John 5:22; Acts 17:30-31), and they’ll spend eternity in the same lake of fire as Herod (Revelation 20:11-15). Is that too blunt for you? Well, forgive me, but this is what will ultimately become of any and all who reject Jesus. That’s God’s word, not mine. And in the end, His is the only one that  counts.

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Wise Men’s Reaction

Series: “Reactions to Christ’s Birth” (post #4)

Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” (Matthew 2:1-2, N.K.J.V.)

They weren’t kings. They weren’t from the Orient. They probably didn’t arrive in Bethlehem until several months (as much as a couple of years) after the night of Christ’s birth. They didn’t follow the star night by night as they made their journey. And the only reason to think there were just three of them rests upon the fact that they brought three gifts. Still, though, all these misconceptions not withstanding, the wise men’s visit to Jesus has classically become an integral part of the Christmas story.

The Biblical term “wise men” translates the Greek noun magi, which is the plural of the Greek noun magos. As a matter of fact, the N.I.V. translation just leaves the Greek word untranslated and goes with “Magi” in verses 1, 7, and 16 of Matthew chapter 2. In Bible times, the Magi were a group of highly educated men who served as advisers to kings in countries such as Babylon and Persia. For example, after Babylon’s King Nebuchadnezzar had strange dreams one night, he asked “the magicians, the astrologers, the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans” (Daniel 2:1-13, N.K.J.V.) to tell him what he had dreamed. It’s likely that those men were Magi. Some scholars believe the Magi were the priests of the Zoroastrian religion that was practiced in ancient Babylon.

The Magi were masters of various fields of study, particularly astronomy. Such men would be impressed by the appearance of a new star in the nighttime sky. They would be even more impressed if they could somehow interpret that star to be the sign of the birth of a prophesied King. Now we’re getting to the heart of why those Magi made the trip from their homeland to Jerusalem/Bethlehem.

Matthew 2:1 tells us they were from the East. In the Bible, all directions are given in relation to Jerusalem, and so the Magi came from a land east of Jerusalem. While it’s true that the Orient (Japan, China, Korea, etc.) is located to the far east of Jerusalem, Babylon is located directly east of it. Unfortunately, the wise men’s words, “…we have seen His star in the East…” have been erroneously understood to mean that the star was located in the sky to the east of them. If that had been the case, it would have placed the star somewhere over the Orient rather than over Bethlehem. No, what the wise men meant was, “We were in the east when we saw His star in the western sky.”

We can’t say with absolute certainty what prompted the Magi to associate that new star with the birth of a king, but it seems obvious that they had access to certain prophecies of the Old Testament. This makes perfect sense in light of the fact that the people of Israel had a definite history with the Babylonians and Persians. Babylon’s Nebuchadnezzar had conquered Israel’s southern kingdom of Judah centuries earlier and had relocated the Jews to Babylon. Seven decades later, when the Medo-Persian empire had conquered the Babylonian empire, Persia’s Cyrus the Great had allowed the Jews to return to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple and reclaim their status as a nation. While approximately 50,000 Jews had taken up this monumental task, millions of Jews had remained in Babylon for the rest of their lives. According to the Bible’s record, the prophet Daniel, who was very old by the time of Cyrus, was one of those who remained in Babylon. Surely, then, the Magi had read the ancient writings of Daniel.

The Magi might also have known about the prophet Balaam’s prophecy from Numbers 24:17, which said, “A Star shall come out of Jacob; A Scepter shall rise out of Israel.” This would explain why they showed up in Jerusalem and specifically asked Herod the Great, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?” One prophecy the Magi evidently didn’t know about was Micah 5:2, which foretold that the “Ruler in Israel” would come forth from “Bethlehem Ephrathah.” If they had known that prophecy, which gave that singular location, they would no doubt have journeyed straight to Bethlehem rather than stopped five miles short in Jerusalem and basically asked for further directions.

This gets us into the matter of the star. While it is commonly believed that the wise men followed the star night by night as they journeyed, this isn’t the story the gospel of Matthew tells. What Matthew describes reads like this:

  • The Magi saw the new star, coupled that appearance up with prophecy they knew, and concluded that they should journey to Jerusalem to find the newborn King of the Jews. (Matthew 2:1-2)
  • They arrived at the palace of Herod the Great, Rome’s handpicked ruler over Judea, and asked him about the location of the birth of the King of the Jews. (Matthew 2:1-2)
  • Herod asked the Jewish priests and scribes where their Messiah was prophesied to be born and was told, “Bethlehem.” (Matthew 2:3-6)
  • Herod sent the Magi on their way to make the five-mile trip to Bethlehem, and as soon as they left Herod’s palace the star which had started them on their long journey reappeared and stood directly over where the young Jesus was. (Matthew 2:7-9)
  • When the Magi saw the star again they rejoiced with exceedingly great joy. (Matthew 2:10)

The Magi then made the short trip to the house where Jesus was. Not only does the story say that at that time Jesus was in a “house” rather than a “manger,” it also uses a different Greek word (paidion, Matthew 2:11) than Luke’s word (brephos, Luke 2:12,16) to describe Him. These two pieces of evidence indicate that some time had passed between the night of Christ’s birth and the night the Magi visited Him.

Another piece of evidence for this conclusion is the fact that a little over a month after Jesus’ birth, when Joseph and Mary took Him to the Jerusalem temple to dedicate Him to the Lord, Mary offered the Mosaic law’s more affordable sacrifice of two small turtledoves or pigeons (Luke 2:24) rather than the more expensive sacrifice of a lamb (Leviticus 12:6-8). Surely Joseph and Mary could have afforded a lamb for a sacrifice if the Magi had already brought their gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh to Jesus. For that matter, Matthew 2:1 begins the whole story of the Magi by plainly saying, “Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea….”

As for how much time actually elapsed between the night of Christ’s birth and the arrival of the Magi, it’s impossible to nail it down precisely. If we assume the star first appeared on the very night Jesus was born, and if we assume the star’s appearance came as a surprise to the Magi, it would have taken several weeks (if not months) for them to even  prepare for the long journey from their homeland to Jerusalem. Furthermore, if they decided to travel by means of a large caravan, which is probable, that would have only increased their preparation time. And then there was the journey itself. As a prime example of how long such a journey would have required, we know that it took Ezra and the group he led four months to make the almost thousand-mile trek from Babylon to Jerusalem (Ezra 7:1-10).

If the Bible provides us with one clue as to the whole question of the Magi’s arrival time, it can be found in a certain answer they gave to Herod. When he asked them when the star had first appeared (Matthew 2:7, 16), apparently their response was, “Two years ago.” I say that because in the wake of their answer, Herod had all of the male children two years old and younger killed in Bethlehem and its surrounding districts (Matthew 2:16). The only other possible explanation for Herod choosing that particular age would be that he wanted to be extremely thorough in his efforts to kill the new king.

At any rate, whatever all the exact details of the story were, what we’re primarily looking for is the Magi’s response to the news that Jesus had been born. And what was that response? Well, it’s obvious, isn’t it? As soon as they got the news by way of that star, they loaded up, left their homeland, and made the trip of many hundreds of miles to find Jesus, worship Him, and bring Him gifts. It’s hard to imagine a better reaction than that!

For the record, I fully expect that like Mary, Joseph, and those shepherds who were on the scene at the manger that first night, the wise men can be correctly classified as saved believers. And if that is indeed a correct assessment, it means that their souls are in heaven right now. It’s no wonder that the old cliche says, “Wise men still seek Him.” So, in light of all this, I guess the only question left to be asked is, “Just how wise are we today?”

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Christmas Traditions, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Shepherds’ Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #3)

Then the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which will be to all people. For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be the sign to you: You will find a Babe wrapped in swaddling cloths, lying in a manger.” (Luke 2:10-12. N.K.J.V.)

Some of the greatest characters from the Old Testament spent time shepherding. The list includes Abel, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, and Amos. Even more impressive is the fact that in passages such as Genesis 49:24, Psalm 23:1-4, Psalm 80:1, Isaiah 40:11, and Ezekiel 34:31 God labels Himself as a Shepherd.

By the time of Christ’s birth, however, the minds of Israel’s religious elite had become so radically different from God’s that shepherds were considered the riffraff of society. First, shepherds were considered ignorant because they had never been schooled in Jewish law. Second, they were considered ceremonially unclean because the nature of their work required them to be around manure and (sometimes) dead carcasses. Third, they were considered unfaithful because they couldn’t leave their flocks long enough to perform all the prescribed rituals to achieve ceremonial cleanness. For these reasons, they weren’t even allowed to enter the Jewish sections of the Temple complex. As a matter of fact, their reputations were so bad that their testimonies weren’t even admissible in court.

So, when God the Father was ready to announce to the world that God the Son had been born in Bethlehem, who were the first people to hear that message? A group of shepherds, of course. It was as if God was saying to the Jewish religious elite, “You people might not think much of shepherds, but they still hold a very special place in My heart.”

Interestingly, the Greek word that is used in reference to the angel’s message is euagelizomai. This is the verb form of euangelistes, the noun from which we get the English word “evangelist.” Just as the noun refers to “one who proclaims good tidings,” the verb means “to proclaim good tidings.” This same Greek verb gets translated in Matthew 11:5 as “have the gospel preached” (N.K.J.V.). When you understand all this, you can understand why commentator Herschel Hobbs wrote, “Actually he (the angel) said, “I evangelize you to a great joy.”

And how did those shepherds respond to that angelic announcement? As soon as the entire host of angels departed from them, the shepherds said, “Let us go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has come to pass, which the Lord has made known to us” (Luke 2:15, N.K.J.V.). You’ll find no hesitation there. No debating. No doubting. They didn’t say, “Let us go to Bethlehem and see if this thing has come to pass.” Nope, they believed the good news and responded accordingly.

As I consider the shepherds and their reaction to the news of Christ’s birth, my mind goes to the lesson of 1 Corinthians 1:26=27. There, Paul says:

Remember, dear brothers and sisters, that few of you were wise in the world’s eyes or powerful or wealthy when God called you. Instead, God chose things the world considers foolish in order to shame those who think they are wise. And he chose things that are powerless to shame those who are powerful. (N.L.T.)

Those shepherds who first heard the news of Christ’s birth certainly weren’t wise in the world’s eyes. Neither were they powerful or wealthy. And yet they not only became the first people to receive the news but also to deliver it. As Luke 2:17-18 tells us:

Now when they had seen Him, they made widely known the saying which was told them concerning this Child. And all those who heard it marveled at those things which were told them by the shepherds. (N.K.J.V.)

Those last three words of that reference might well jump off the page at us. This incredible story, this message of salvation, this potentially soul-saving piece of good news wasn’t told by the priests or the scribes. Instead, it was told by the shepherds. Remember, these are the guys whose testimony isn’t even admissible in court! I mean, the news that a Savior has been born and is lying in an animal’s feeding trough in Bethlehem is unbelievable enough, but now it’s being told by men who are supposedly the most unreliable witnesses in that whole culture. God must have gotten a real kick out of that, right? And you know what? He gets just as much a kick out of us today when we share the good news about Jesus. In this way, we should all have a little “shepherd” in us, and it should come out anytime we are around someone who needs to hear the good news about the Savior.

Posted in Angels, Christ's Birth, Christmas, Evangelism, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth", The Gospel, Witnessing | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment