Jesus & the Law

Posted on August 2, 2017 by russellmckinney

“The Old Testament Law” (post #2)

The Old Testament law was not a failed experiment. It did exactly what it was supposed to do. Don’t think that God the Father sent God the Son (Jesus) down to earth as a quick fix because the Jews had bombed so miserably at keeping the law. In Jesus’ most famous sermon, The Sermon on the Mount, He made a point of saying:

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, nor the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. (Matthew 5:17-18, N.I.V.)

The fact is that God the Father knew going in that the Jews wouldn’t be able to keep the law perfectly. As I noted in my previous post, He wanted to use the law to teach them what He already knew: that they were born sinners who needed forgiveness of sin. The law was never about producing salvation for the Jews; it was about proving their need of a Messiah who could offer salvation to them. That Messiah would be Jesus. As Paul says in Galatians 3:24, the law was the tutor that played the role of bringing the Jews to Christ.

Jesus Himself was born “under the law” (Galatians 4:4). He was circumcised on the eighth day according to the requirements of the law (Leviticus 12:3; Luke 2:21). He lived His life under the authority of the law (Luke 10:25-26, Matthew 23:23). He defended the law against the Jewish religious leaders who perverted it (Mark 7:1-13). He even taught a deeper application of it (Matthew 5:21-48; 12:1-14). In all things and in all ways, He kept the law perfectly (Matthew 3:16-17; Luke 9:34-35; John 8:29,46,55; 1 Peter 2:21-22; Hebrews 4:14-15).

It was His sinless perfection at keeping the law that made Jesus an eligible candidate to die for the sins of the world. Had He sinned even once over the course of His life by missing the mark of the law in any way, He would have needed help Himself as a sinner. But since He kept the law perfectly, day in and day out, year in and year out, He was worthy to die as the sinless, substitutionary sacrifice for the sins of the world.

Remember that it’s sin that necessitates death (Romans 5:12). Adam and Eve were immortal until they ate of the forbidden fruit. Therefore, Jesus’ sinless life afforded Him the option of not having to pay the penalty of death. He forfeited that option, though, and voluntarily chose to die as the payment for the sins of the human race.

This, then, is how Jesus fulfilled the law (Luke 24:44). He was the first Jew to ever successfully run its gauntlet. He dove down to the bottom of its depths and came back up to the surface having conquered it. By doing this and then dying on the cross and resurrecting, He ended (completed/fulfilled) the law. While its true the Jews continued to observe the law even after Jesus’ resurrection (and still do for that matter), none of it is God’s will. In God’s eyes, the law era is over.

The word “testament” means “covenant.” The Bible’s Old Testament is the record of God’s covenant with Abraham and his descendants, the Jews. God formally entered into that covenant in Genesis 15:1-21. The sign (mark) of the covenant was male circumcision (Genesis 17:1-14), the promised land of the covenant was Canaan (Genesis 15:18-21), and the rule book for the covenant was the law.

However, once Jesus had fulfilled (completed/ended) the law, He instituted a new covenant with all those who place their faith (belief) in Him as Savior. The Bible’s New Testament is the record of this covenant. In ancient times, covenants were ratified with blood sacrifices (see Genesis 15:1-21), and Christ’s new covenant was no different. He ratified it with His own blood, the blood He shed in dying on the cross. Jesus Himself attested to this via the symbolism involved in The Lord’s Supper. As He said of the cup portion of the ceremony, “Drink from it, all of you. For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:27-28).

Putting all this together, we can understand perfectly why Paul says in Romans 10:4, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” Similarly, Hebrews 8:13 says that Jesus has made the first covenant “obsolete” (N.K.J.V.). Going back to Paul’s own analogy of the law as a “tutor” that played the role of bringing the Jews to Jesus, Paul went on to say, “But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor” (Galatians 3:25, N.K.J.V.).

And so, do we, as Christians, live under the Old Testament law? No. Certainly we can study the law and build its moral principles and guidelines into our lives. For that matter, nine of the ten commandments — excluding the one to keep the Jewish Sabbath — are restated in the New Testament as commands to Christians. But God doesn’t require Christians to live out the entirety of the law or carry out all its specific details.

The Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:1-29) was the monumental meeting in which the early church settled the debate concerning the Christian’s relationship to the law. That meeting produced The Jerusalem Decree (Acts 15:23-29), a point of doctrine that Paul made one of the major themes of his writings (Romans 6:14; 7:4; 10:4; Galatians 3:13; 4:4-5). The specific question that prompted The Jerusalem Council to render this decree was: Must Gentile Christian males be circumcised and keep the law? The answer The Jerusalem Council gave was, No.

Nevertheless, let me say that the Christian being free from the law does not mean that he is free to live any way he chooses. In Galatians 5:13-14, Paul explains that Christian liberty should lead Christians to serve others through love. He even paraphrases Christ’s words from Matthew 7:12 and 22:40 in saying, “For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself'” (N.K.J.V.) He then follows that up a few verses later by saying, “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2, N.K.J.V.). In another passage, 2 Corinthians 3:1-3, he describes those to whom he ministered as being “tablets of flesh” rather than “tablets of stone.” The teaching is that when Christians minister to (serve) others, they live out a new kind of law, a spiritual one written into their hearts by Jesus.

Posted in Christian Liberty, Doing Good, God's Work, Ministry, Salvation, Series: "The Old Testament Law", The Old Testament Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Was the Law & Why Did God Give It?

Posted on July 31, 2017 by russellmckinney

“The Old Testament Law” (post #1)

A chicken and an elephant were locked in a cage together. The chicken turned to the elephant and said, “We need to set a few ground rules. First, let’s not step on each other.”

Rules. Like it or not, they are a part of life. There was even a rule way back in the garden of Eden: Don’t eat the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Of course, God doesn’t call His rules by that name. Instead, He calls them “commandments” or “laws.”

With this post we begin a short series on God’s greatest rule book, the Old Testament Law. If you’ve done much Bible study, spent a fair amount of time in church, or heard your share of preaching, you’re probably vaguely familiar with the term “the law.” The problem is that most people, even most Christians, are just that, vaguely familiar with it. Many of them know just enough about it to be dangerous. That’s why a series like this is needed.

The law also goes by the titles “the law of Moses” and “the Mosaic law.” Those two descriptions stem from the fact that God gave the law to Moses atop Mount Sinai to give to the nation of Israel. What many people don’t understand is that the law was not just one rule or even a short list of rules. To the contrary, it was a lengthy, complex body of rules, regulations, restrictions, and rituals. Still, though, it can rightly be thought of as a single unit.

By the Jewish way of reckoning, there were 613 specific commandments (rules, laws) in the law. There is no singular Old Testament passage in which all 613 of these are recorded. To find them all, you have to study multiple sections of the books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

The law was given exclusively to the people of Israel. As evidence of this, in Romans 2:11-16 the apostle Paul describes Gentiles as being “without law” and Jews as being “in the law.” He does point out, though, that when a Gentile’s conscience causes that Gentile to live out the moral principles of the law, that Gentile shows the work of the law written in his or her heart.

The opening section of the law was the listing of the famous Ten Commandments. We find it in Exodus 20:1-17. Not only did those Ten Commandments serve as the beginning of the law, they also served as its moral center. God wrote those Ten Commandments upon tablets of stone for Moses, but the rest of the law wasn’t written upon stone.

Theologians typically divide the law into three main parts: the moral, the ceremonial, and the judicial. First, as I said, the Ten Commandments served as the moral part. Second, the ceremonial part was dominated by all the rituals and rules regarding the various offerings (some blood, some bloodless) the people of Israel were to offer up to God. Those laws, along with all the laws concerning Israel’s priesthood, regulated Israel’s worship life. Finally, third, the judicial part featured all the laws that had to do with humans doing harm to each other. Under those laws, major offenses were death-penalty crimes while lesser offenses merited a wide-ranging scope of punishments other than death.

For the record, I should probably mention that the Jews didn’t use this three-fold division to break down the law. What they did was divide the law’s 613 commandments into twelve families of commandments. Those twelve families were then subdivided into twelve additional families of positive commandments and twelve additional families of negative commandments.

But why did God give the law to Israel? Well, there were at least three reasons, and I’ll name them as the conclusion to this opening post of the series. Here goes:

  1. Any nation needs a set of laws to keep its citizens in check, restrain evil, and thus promote the advancement of its society. The newly formed nation of Israel, having just come out of its bondage in Egypt, was certainly no exception.
  2. The law was a perfect vehicle for showcasing the mind of God on a long list of topics. The law evidenced His priorities, established His standards, and made clear His opinions of specific behaviors.
  3. God intended for the law to be a “mirror” through which the Jews could view their conduct as either sinful or holy (James 1:23-25). In this way, He wanted the law to be a teaching tool that provided them with a knowledge of their sin and their need for a Savior who could provide forgiveness for their sins (Romans 3:20). In regards to salvation, the law was an all-or-nothing proposition because breaking one part of it equated to breaking the entire unit (James 2:8-11). So, as the Jews tried to keep the whole unit perfectly, and inevitably failed to do so somewhere along the line, God wanted them to learn firsthand that they were sinners who could not “work” their way into His kingdom. This is why the apostle Paul called the law a “tutor” to bring the Jews to Christ (Galatians 3:21-25). 
Posted in Series: "The Old Testament Law", The Old Testament Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who Are You Dancing With?

Posted on July 28, 2017 by russellmckinney

Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world….” (John 18:36, N.K.J.V.)

Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. (1 John 2:15, N.K.J.V.)

Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend to the world makes himself an enemy of God. (James 4:4, N.K.J.V.)

For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? (Mark 8:36, N.K.J.V.)

When we hear or read the word “world” our instinct is to equate it with the word “planet.” In this way, the “world” becomes the sum total of the rocks, mountains, valleys, deserts, streams, rivers, oceans, plants, and trees of planet Earth. Interestingly, though, this is not how the New Testament primarily uses the word.

The Greek word our English New Testaments most often translate as “world” is kosmos. This word occurs over 200 times in the New Testament, including the four verses I’ve cited as my opening texts for this post. Kosmos can have different meanings, but for the greater part it refers to an order or an arrangement.

When used in this way, the “world” becomes the arranged order through which Satan rules the human race. This explains how Jesus could rightly call him “the ruler of this world (kosmos)” (John 12:31). Satan is the ruler because, as we’re told in Ephesians 2:2, lost people walk “according to the course of this world (kosmos),” and that course is ordered and arranged by Satan, whom the verse calls “the prince of the power of the air.” Along the same lines, 1 John 5:19 says the whole world (kosmos) lies under the sway and control of Satan.

The point here is that God doesn’t mind the Christian loving planet Earth’s mountains, valleys, streams, rivers, oceans, plants, etc., but He has major problems with the Christian loving the world order through which Satan controls the Earth’s inhabitants. This order includes the “world’s”: banking industry, political realm, internet, movie industry, television industry, publishing industry, print media, news media, advertising industry, fashion industry, pornography industry, false religion realm, abortion industry, sports realm, alcoholic beverage industry, drug industry, gambling industry, and any other industry or realm that operates by and large outside the Lordship of Jesus Christ.

It’s this world order that is characterized by “the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life” (1 John 2:16). It’s this world order that has so-called “wisdom” that is rated as mere foolishness with God (1 Corinthians 3:19). It’s this world order into which false prophets and deceivers have gone (1 John 4:1; 2 John v.7). It’s this world order that hates Christians (1 John 3:13). It’s this world order that made Paul and the other apostles feel like its “filth” (1 Corinthians 4:13). It’s this world order that is not worthy of being graced by the presence of God’s persecuted people and martyrs (Hebrews 11:32-38).

This is the world order from which we Christians are commanded to keep ourselves separated. While it’s true that we have to live and function in the order to some degree (1 Corinthians 5:9-10), we should never be of it (John 17:16). We belong to God (Romans 8:9; 1 Corinthians 6:19-20), not to Satan (Matthew 13:36-38; John 8:42-44). We are citizens of heaven, not this “world” (Philippians 3:20). Therefore, our separation should be evidenced in our priorities, goals, pursuits, standards, and opinions. It should be seen in how we spend our time, energy, and money. We should stand out from Satan’s world order as clearly as light stands out from darkness (Matthew 5:14-16; 1 Thessalonians 5:4-5) and sheep stand out from goats (Matthew 25:31-46).

1 John 2:17 tells us this “world” (kosmos) is passing away. That’s why it isn’t a good idea to attach yourself to it or align yourself with it. For the Christian, however, the promise is that he or she will surely overcome the “world” (1 John 5:4-5). This promise comes with a guarantee because our Savior, Jesus, first overcame the “world” (John 16:33).

But how sad is it that a world order established and entrenched by Satan keeps all the human race’s lost people constantly under his sway? I can think of only one thing sadder, and that is the fact that so many truly born-again Christians have become so comfortable in the order. Rather than stand out from it, they’ve made themselves at home in it.

And so I’ll ask you, Christian, does this describe you? If it does, then I’ll remind you that you are failing miserably at the command of separation from the “world.” Remember, not only does the world’s order hate you, it’s the same order that got your Savior crucified. That means that you dishonor His name every time you let the order pour you into its mold and get you to thinking and operating like it does. Yes, that’s hard preaching, but it’s high time that we Christians stopped dancing with Satan’s “world” and went back to dancing with the one that brought us: Jesus.

Posted in Abortion, Alcohol, Backsliding, Business, Commitment, Desires, Drugs, Entertainment, Faithfulness, Gambling, Homosexuality, Lesbianism, Personal Holiness, Politics, Priorities, Sanctification, Satan, Sports, The Devil | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kateland’s Answer

Posted on July 24, 2017 by russellmckinney

I was in my first pastorate, and our church was having its annual Bible School week. The attendance was excellent each night as several visiting kids who weren’t part of our church were coming. One of those visitors was a sweet little girl named Kateland. She was probably around ten years old.

Kateland’s teacher brought her to me one night and said, “Kateland would like to talk to you about her salvation.” I said, “Sure.” I then took Kateland into the room I was using for counseling. Once there, the conversation went like this:

Me: “Alright, Kateland, what did you want to talk to me about?”

Kateland: “I want to get saved.”

Me: “That’s great, and I’ll be glad to help you with that. But, first, I’d like for you to tell me what makes you think you are not saved?” (The answer I was hoping for was something along the lines of, “Because God is holy, I’m a sinner, and I need to have my sins forgiven.” Actually, though, I was going to play off any answer Kateland gave and use it as a starting point to present the plan of salvation. Unfortunately for me, I wasn’t prepared for what she said.)

Kateland: “Well, you could get saved at the church I used to go to, but I didn’t. Then, so many people started getting saved at that church that we had to go to another church. That church didn’t save anybody, and I couldn’t get saved there. So, I’d like to get saved at this church.”

As I sat there and listened to all that, I couldn’t help but chuckle. In all my years of counseling with kids during Bible Schools, that answer still stands out as the most memorable. As a matter of fact, I went home that night and made a point of writing the answer down verbatim and putting it in my files, just so I wouldn’t forget it.

And how did I respond to Kateland’s answer? After I processed it for a second or two, I decided the best thing to do was scale everything back to the simplest basics of the plan of salvation and walk her through them. So, I did that. Then, when I was finished, we bowed our heads and I led her in a “Repeat after me…” prayer in which she asked Jesus to be her Savior. She was as sincere as she could be, and I like to think that she got saved that night. I really can’t state with any certainty that she did, though, because her parents attended another church and I never got the chance to talk with her again.

I’m reminded of Kateland’s answer sometimes when I’m trying to lead a child to Jesus. It’s so hard to discern how much a child truly understands about God, sin, Christ’s death on the cross, and salvation. Certainly, you don’t ever want to discourage any child who says, “I want to get saved.” But, on the other hand, you don’t want to play a part in helping anybody think they have gotten saved when they really haven’t. Even more than that, you don’t want to have a hand in getting a kid baptized who isn’t even a Christian.

In the end, the best you can do is faithfully, sincerely, and tactfully work with any child who comes to you to talk about salvation. It’s always good to keep the gospel as simple as you can without gutting it of its necessary theology. Also, it’s important that you ask God to give you wisdom and discernment to know when a child is genuinely ready to accept Jesus and when some more seasoning is required. God knows who He is drawing to Himself by way of the Holy Spirit, and the same Spirit who is drawing the child will give you the confirmation that the child is ready to get saved.

It’s an inexact science to be sure, no doubt about it, but I’ve found that God is more than willing to help the Christian who is honestly trying to do right by a child. The fact is that Katelands are out there everywhere, and we need to do our part in leading them to Jesus. Somebody did that for you once, Christian, and you should be willing to do it for others, whether they be old or young. Again, it’s not necessarily an easy thing to do. But on the plus side, the rewards of winning someone to Jesus, whether that person be an adult or a child, are nothing less than out of this world.

Posted in Baptism, Children, Church, Discernment, Evangelism, God's Work, Humor, Ministry, Parenting, Pastors, Personal, Reward, Salvation, The Holy Spirit, Witnessing, Youth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Look Out for Those Unequal Yokes

Posted on July 22, 2017 by russellmckinney

Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God. As God has said: “I will dwell in them and walk among them. I will be their God, and they shall be My people.” Therefore “Come out from among them and be separate, says the Lord. Do not touch what is unclean, and I will receive you. I will be a Father to you, and you shall be My sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty.” (2 Corinthians 6:14-18, N.K.J.V.)

What exactly constitutes an unequal yoke in the life of the Christian? While I understand that the universally accepted application involves a Christian marrying a lost person, it’s obvious that there is more to the command than that. I mean, 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 is a fairly lengthy passage, but it doesn’t even use the word “marriage” once.

In case you don’t know, a yoke is a harness device that sits over the shoulders of two livestock animals, attaches underneath the animals’ necks, and binds the animals together for working. It is most often associated with a team of oxen pulling something, but it can be used with any pair of the same type of work animals. An unequal yoke is created when two different kinds of animals are harnessed together. An ox in one ring of the harness and a horse in the other is an unequal yoke. A horse in one ring and a donkey in the other is an unequal yoke. God’s Old Testament law for Israel even included the following specific law:

You shall not plow with an ox and a donkey together. (Exodus 22:10, N.K.J.V.)

An unequal yoke isn’t an effective way of getting work done because different types of animals are fundamentally incompatible due to their size, strength, step, and mannerisms. You see, the idea behind yoking two animals together is to get them to work as a single, unified unit, and that can’t happen if one animal is pulling to the left while the other is pulling to the right. It also can’t happen if the animals don’t pull in synced tandem or drive forward at precisely the same moment to get the weight moving. That’s why you need two like animals in a yoke. As Amos 3:3 says:

Can two walk together, unless they are agreed? (N.K.J.V.)

But, getting back to my opening question, what does an unequal yoke actually look like in terms of the Christian life? To help us with this answer, allow me to offer direct quotes from seven solid Bible teachers. Here goes:

This is a wise and wide-ranging prohibition. It frowns upon the marriage of a believer with an unbeliever. It looks with disfavor on a believer entering into a business partnership with an unbeliever. It discountenances a believer joining in a club, society, lodge, or fraternity with an unbeliever. The reason is simple: Before long, the believer and the unbeliever will start to pull in opposite directions — either that or the believer will be dragged into behavior which will compromise his testimony and trouble his conscience. (John Phillips)

The great unanswered question is, What is a yoke? Is a business partnership a yoke? Is a union membership a yoke? Is marriage a yoke? Is a date with a non-Christian a yoke? Not all associations are yokes, but yokes have two characteristics by which we can always identify them. The first one is that a yoke is not easily broken. It is a kind of permanent relationship. When you yoke two animals together they are bound together; they do not have any choice. Uncomfortable as it may be, they must do things together. The second mark of a yoke is that it constrains someone; it does not permit independent action. There is something that forces you to comply with what the other one wants to do, whether you like it or not. Any kind of relationship that does not permit a believer to follow his or her Lord in all things is a yoke. Even a friendship can be a yoke. If it is the kind of possessive friendship in which you feel you cannot do what God wants you to do because you will offend your friend, then that is a yoke, and it must be broken. (Ray Stedman)

Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers is often quoted as a prohibition of a mixed marriage. This is no doubt included, but the exhortation means more and includes every form of alliance with the world and ungodly principles. It also includes the so-called “religious world” with its unscriptural practices and denials of the truth. (A.C. Gaebelein)

It certainly refers to the marriage relationship. A Christian should not marry an unsaved person…In addition to this, it refers to business. A Christian should not go into partnership with one who does not know the Lord. It applies clearly to secret orders and fraternities. How could one who is faithful to Christ consistently go on in an association where the name of the Lord Jesus is unwelcome? Its application to social life would be as follows: A Christian should maintain contact with the unsaved in an effort to win them to Christ, but he should never engage in their sinful pleasures or in any of their activities in such a way as to lead them to think he is no different than they. Then this section would also apply to religious matters. A faithful follower of Christ would not want to hold membership in a church where unbelievers were knowingly admitted as members. (William MacDonald)

Separation is not from contact with evil in the world, but from complicity with it and conformity to it. (Merrill Unger, Unger’s Bible Handbook)

Many commentators apply this command to marriage in particular, pointing out that a believer should not marry an unbeliever. But I do not interpret Paul’s instruction here as having to do with marriage only. It includes many things besides the martial relationship. It extends to all things which would be detrimental to a believer’s testimony — business, pleasure, marriage, religion, or whatever. (Oliver B. Greene)

This injunction applies to marriage, business, and to ecclesiastical and intimate personal relationships. (Charles Ryrie)

And so, by defining the term “unequal yolk” by way of these quotes, we are left with a workable starter’s list of alliances and relationships of which the Christian should beware. I don’t present this list as an end-all-be-all kind of thing, but it’s at least enough to get our minds thinking in the right direction. Therefore, I offer it not only as the conclusion to this post but also as a word of instruction to any Christian out there who sincerely wants to avoid unequal yokes.

  1. A Christian should not marry a lost person. Of course, sometimes such marriages come to pass as two lost people marry and one becomes a Christian sometime during the marriage. Also, sometimes Christians simply miss God’s will in regards to who they should marry. In the case of any mixed marriage, God’s rules are laid out in 1 Corinthians 7:10-16.
  2. A Christian should not enter into what would be considered a binding, “hitched together” business relationship with a lost person. It’s one thing for a Christian to purchase a produce from a business that is owned by a lost person, but it’s quite another thing for that Christian to literally become a co-owner of that same business. Somewhere down the line of business, that Christian will undoubtedly be forced to compromise his or her spiritual convictions in the name of profit.
  3. A Christian should not become so unified with any one political party that he or she refuses to break with that party even when the party’s political platform pushes an agenda that is clearly unbiblical and, thus, anti-God.
  4. A Christian should not join any group that requires some type of special initiation if that group does not unashamedly proclaim the name Jesus Christ and adhere to His standards of personal holiness. College fraternities and sororities that major on drinking and premarital sex are unequal yokes for the Christian. The same thing can be said of Masonic lodges and other societies that meet in secret, engage in ritualistic ceremonies, seek divine wisdom apart from Jesus Christ, manipulate worldly power and influence for the purported purpose of doing good, and speak only of a “Supreme Being” or the “Great Architect of the Universe” as opposed to clearly naming the name of Jesus Christ.
  5. A Christian should not join or remain in a church or a denomination that has doctrinally compromised itself to the point of out-and-out heresy. The Christian should never feel at home anywhere — and that includes churches and denominations — where the plain teachings of the Bible are either casually ignored or blatantly contradicted.
Posted in Abortion, Business, Choices, Church, Church Attendance, Commitment, Decisions, Discernment, Discipleship, Doctrine, God's Will, God's Work, Government, Homosexuality, Influence, Lesbianism, Marriage, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Brief Addendum to “The Ark of the Covenant” Series

Posted on July 19, 2017 by russellmckinney

Since I’ve already had a reader ask about the Ark the apostle John saw in Revelation 11:19, let me address that verse. In hindsight, I should have included a word about it in the first post of the series, but I had so much other information on my mind that the verse just kind of got lost in the wash. So, let me fix that oversight right now.

As I type this there is an actual sanctuary in heaven, one not made with human hands (Acts 7:48;17:24). According to Hebrews 8:2, the Lord Himself erected it. Sometimes this heavenly sanctuary is referred to as a “tabernacle” (Hebrews 8:2; Revelation 13:6; 15:5). Much more frequently, though, it is referred to as a “temple” (2 Samuel 22:7; Psalm 11:4; Psalm 18:6; Jonah 2:7; Micah 1:2; Habakkuk 2:20; Revelation 7:15; 11:19; 14:15-17; 15:6-8; 16:1,17). It’s possible that there are actually two sanctuaries in heaven, one a tabernacle and the other a temple, but my interpretation is that there is just one. (By the way, keep in mind that we are talking about the heaven that exists now, not the heavenly city of New Jerusalem that doesn’t come into play until after Christ’s millennial reign. Revelation 21:22 flatly says that city will not have a temple in it.)

Now, what we must understand is that everything about the earthly tabernacle that God instructed Moses and the Israelites to build was a “copy” and a “shadow” of the things in the heavenly tabernacle/temple. The proof texts on this are Hebrews 8:1-6 and Hebrews 9:23-24. Furthermore, Exodus 25:40 and Hebrews 8:5 probably mean that God somehow allowed Moses to see the heavenly tabernacle/temple, complete with all its features, when Moses was atop Mount Sinai with Him.

And so it makes perfect sense that heaven’s tabernacle/temple has its own: altar (Revelation 6:9; 8:3-5; 9:13; 14:18; 16:7), Holy of Holies — called “the Holiest” (N.K.J.V.) or “the Most Holy Place” (N.I.V.)  — (Hebrews 10:19), and Ark of the Covenant (Revelation 11:19). For that matter, even though there are no specific passages to offer as evidence, it could well be that the heavenly tabernacle/temple also has its own: Bronze Laver (washing basin) (Exodus 30:17-21), Table of Showbread (Exodus 25:23-30), Golden Lampstand (Exodus 25:31-40), and Altar of Incense (Exodus 30:1-10).

What this means is that the Ark of the Covenant that John saw in Revelation 11:19 was the heavenly original upon which the earthly copy was based. John even says it was in the temple of God in heaven. While it’s possible that John saw the Ark that Moses and the Israelites built, that Ark having been miraculously transported up to heaven and placed in the heavenly sanctuary at some point, the better interpretation is that he saw heaven’s prototype.

Posted in Heaven, Series: "The Ark of the Covenant", The Ark of the Covenant | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Ark of the Covenant Going Forward

Posted on July 18, 2017 by russellmckinney

The Ark of the Covenant series (post #10)

This post will be the last in our series on The Ark of the Covenant, and this time we’ll deal with the Ark’s potential impact upon the world going forward. First, let’s get one thing clear: The Ark of the Covenant walks hand in hand with a Jewish Temple. Ideally, the Ark should sit inside a cube-shaped room called the Holy of Holies that serves as the innermost section of a Jewish Temple and is sectioned off from the rest of the Temple by a thick curtain. So, let’s talk about the possibility of a new Jewish Temple being built in Jerusalem someday.

Would it surprise you to learn that the Bible teaches that such a Temple will be built? 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 describes the Antichrist, the leader who will dominate the world as Satan’s Messiah during the seven-year tribulation period the Bible says is to come upon the earth. In verse 4 of that passage, we read these words as part of the description of the Antichrist:

who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. (N.K.J.V.)

Obviously, in order for the Antichrist to sit in the temple of God, there has to be a temple of God. But right now there isn’t one. Surely, then, there is going to come a time in the future when the Jews will build another Temple. It’s even probable that the opportunity to build this new Temple will be part of a seven-year peace treaty the Antichrist will sign with Israel (Daniel 9:27). Halfway through this treaty, however, he will break it and take over the Jewish Temple as his own. Jesus called this act “the abomination of desolation,” and it will occur at the midway point of the tribulation period (Matthew 24:15).

Technically speaking, this future Temple will be the third Temple — Solomon’s being the first, Zerubbabel’s being the second, and Herod the Great’s being classified as an expansion of Zerubbabel’s rather than a new one built from scratch. That expansion was such a major overhaul that historians sometimes speak of Herod’s Temple as being distinct and separate from Zerubbabel’s, but the Jewish people don’t see it that way. For the record, this future third temple is also spoken of in Daniel 9:26-27; Daniel 12:11; and Revelation 11:1-2.

The Temple Institute is a Jewish organization in Israel that is fanatically devoted to getting a new Temple built in Jerusalem. For the past few decades the group’s members have been doing advanced research on the historical specifics of the previous two Temples and creating replicas of all the items that were used in Temple worship. As of today close to 100 such items have been created. Also, the Temple Institute has been involved in tracing ancestral bloodlines from the tribe of Levi in order to identify priestly candidates for the establishing of a new Levitical priesthood to serve in the new Temple.

For all their considerable efforts, though, The Temple Institute wakes up every day and faces a colossal problem for which they have no answer. That problem is: Any new Jewish Temple must be built on the same spot where the previous Temples stood, and right now the Muslim shrine The Dome of the Rock sits squarely on that spot. As a matter of fact, whereas Solomon’s Temple stood for approximately 400 years and Zerubbabel’s/Herod’s Temple stood for approximately 600 years, The Dome of the Rock has stood for over 1,300 years and counting. This means that something is going to have to give if a new Temple is ever going to be built to fulfill Biblical prophecy.

Various suggestions have been offered as to what might give. First, perhaps the Jews will relent on the location and build their new Temple on a spot other than the site of The Dome of the Rock. That’s highly unlikely. Second, perhaps The Dome of the Rock doesn’t actually sit exactly where the Jewish Temple once stood, which would mean that a new Jewish Temple could be built right beside it. Some experts see this is a very viable option, but their opinion is in the minority. Third, perhaps a massive earthquake will destroy The Dome of the Rock and clear the way for a new Jewish Temple to be built. This idea does sound plausible at first, especially in light of the various earthquakes that are mentioned as being part of the prophetic timeline. However, even if an earthquake does take down The Dome of the Rock, wouldn’t the Muslims fight hard to build another Muslim shrine on the site? Finally, fourth, perhaps the Jewish military forces will one day rise up, take complete control of all of Jerusalem, expel the Muslims from the city, destroy The Dome of the Rock, and build the Temple in its place. Well, I’m not saying that can’t happen, but can you imagine the retaliation the Muslims would unleash if all that came to pass? Would a new Jewish Temple last a month?

For the sake of argument, though, let’s concede that somehow, someway, someday a new Jewish Temple is going to get built in Jerusalem. The question will then become: Must that new Temple house the Ark of the Covenant in order to be seen as legitimate in the eyes of Jews? Somewhat surprisingly, the answer to that is, no.

Keep in mind that the Bible never mentions the Ark being in Zerubbabel’s Temple or in Herod the Great’s expanded and updated version of that Temple. And yet, despite the absence of the Ark, Jesus called that Temple “My Father’s house.” Even more than that, He felt compelled to cleanse it on two separate occasions (John 2:13-22; Luke 19:45-48). Furthermore, that Temple served as the religious heart of Israel for the four centuries between the closing of the Old Testament and the opening of the New Testament.

But will the third Temple house the Ark? I suppose that depends upon whether or not the Ark can be found at that time. If the Jewish rabbis are telling the truth when they confidently state that the Ark is hidden in a cave underneath the Temple Mount, I’m sure they would do everything they could to bring it out and immediately place it inside the Holy of Holies of the new Temple. For that matter, even if the rabbis are wrong and the Ark is currently someplace other than under the Temple Mount, it’s possible that during those days God could allow it to be discovered wherever it is. But as I said even if the Ark is never found Jewish history has proven that the new Temple could still be considered legitimate without it.

The fact is, though, that no matter how all of this plays out the third Jewish Temple (Ark or no Ark) will not be in existence long. We know this because Bible prophecy explains that the third Temple will be replaced by yet another Temple for Christ’s 1,000 year reign upon this earth following the tribulation period. This “millennial Temple” is described in detail in Ezekiel chapters 40 through 48.

The Bible doesn’t specify precisely how the tribulation-period Temple will be destroyed to make way for the millennial Temple, but there are a variety of options. It might be destroyed as part of a great earthquake that strikes Jerusalem in the last half of the tribulation period, kills 7,000 people, and levels a tenth of the city (Revelation 11:13). On the other hand, it might be destroyed as part of a later earthquake that divides the city into three parts (Revelation 16:19-21). Then again, it might be destroyed as part of the Mount of Olives being split in two when Jesus touches down upon the mountain to walk this earth again, win the battle of Armageddon that closes the tribulation period, and establish his 1,000 year reign (Zechariah 14:4).

The point is that whatever the exact cause of the destruction turns out to be, the tribulation-period Temple will be destroyed somehow and replaced with the millennial Temple. And will this millennial Temple house the Ark of the Covenant? No, it won’t. We can say this with certainty because Jeremiah 3:16 says of those days:

“Then it shall come to pass, when you are multiplied and increased in the land in those days,” says the Lord, “that they will say no more, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It shall not come to mind, nor shall they remember it, nor shall they visit it, nor shall it be made anymore.” (N.K.J.V.)

You might ask, “But why won’t the Ark be in the millennial Temple?” The answer is: You don’t need the Ark when Jesus is personally on the scene! You see, having the Ark sitting inside the Temple was the Old Testament version of having the presence of God inside the Temple. The “mercy seat” that served as the lid to the Ark of the Covenant was quite literally God’s throne upon the earth. That’s why the Ark couldn’t be approached in just any way by just anybody at just anytime. In Christ’s millennial reign, however, Jesus will be personally, visibly, bodily reigning upon the restored throne of David in Jerusalem (Jeremiah 23:5-6; Luke 1:30-33). Therefore, the highest purpose the Ark always served will be swallowed up in a finalized fulfillment in Christ’s presence upon the earth, and that will render the Ark’s services null and void.

As for what happens following the millennial Temple and Christ’s 1,000 year reign, here again the Ark has no role to play. Following Christ’s millennial reign Satan and his followers will be eternally judged, and then a new age (an eternal one) will begin as God will usher in a new heaven, a new earth, and an eternal city of New Jerusalem in which all of history’s saved will dwell for all eternity (Revelation 20:7-12; 21:1-21). Not only will the Ark not be a part of this New Jerusalem, the city won’t even have a Temple (Revelation 21:22).

And so in terms of the Ark of the Covenant playing a role in future history, the Bible only leaves one possible option. That option is the Temple the Jews will build either early on in the tribulation period or perhaps even just before the period begins. If the Ark isn’t brought out of hiding to sit inside the Holy of Holies of that particular Temple, then I dare say the world has seen the last of the Ark, because there simply is no place for it in either Christ’s millennial Temple or the new heaven, new earth, and New Jerusalem that follows the millennial age. I realize this isn’t the exciting answer that most people want to hear, but it is the one the Bible presents as the truth.

As for me, I’m pulling for the Ark to be discovered and revealed one day, but if that never happens I’m not going to lose any sleep over it. I am, after all, a born-again Christian, and that means that my body has now become the dwelling place of God the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:9-11; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; and 2 Timothy 1:14). This places me in a far better situation than anyone who ever worshiped in a Temple in which the Ark of the Covenant was housed. Always keep this in mind, Christian, anytime you think about the Ark. Whatever awe and glory the Ark once held (and might still hold), none of it can compare to the intimate fellowship you get to experience with the Lord each and every day simply by waking up and breathing.

Posted in Series: "The Ark of the Covenant", The Ark of the Covenant | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is the Ark of the Covenant in Jerusalem?

Posted on July 14, 2017 by russellmckinney

The Ark of the Covenant series (post #9)

The majority of Orthodox Jewish rabbis who currently live in Jerusalem do not stress themselves over the possible whereabouts of the Ark of the Covenant. They don’t run around all over the globe chasing down every last theory for where the Ark might be. They don’t promote and fund archaeological digs here, there, and everywhere. They simply rest in their conviction that the Ark remains hidden in a cave underneath the Temple Mount, right where it has been for at least 2,000 years. More specifically, they say the cave is located directly under the spot where the Holy of Holies for Solomon’s Temple, Zerubbabel’s Temple, and Herod’s Temple stood. And by applying a concept of “vertical air space” they contend that the former site of the Holy of Holies sanctifies the ground beneath it.

Consider the following quote from Rabbi Chaim Richman:

Jews have an unbroken chain of recorded information, passed down from generation to generation, which indicates its (the Ark’s) exact location. There is a big fascination with finding the lost Ark, but nobody asked a Jew. We have known where it is for thousands of years. It could be reached if we excavated Temple Mount, but that area is controlled by Muslims.

Another Rabbi, Yehuda Getz, believes that in 1982 he came within forty feet of finding the cave where the Ark sits. He was leading a team in conducting a search in an old tunnel that ran perpendicular to the Western Wall, the last standing section of the retaining wall that once served as the perimeter for the entire Temple Mount site of Herod’s Temple. According to Rabbi Getz, he was systematically working his way through that tunnel, carefully clearing away centuries of debris as he progressed, making headway further and further back underneath the Temple Mount. He knew he had to be getting close to the spot directly underneath where the Temple’s Holy of Holies had once stood. But that’s when the Muslims discovered that diggings were taking place underneath The Dome of the Rock, the Muslim shrine built in 691 A.D. on the site of the former Jewish Temple. The Muslims quickly threatened a riot that would have torn the city of Jerusalem apart, and Rabbi Getz and his team stopped their digging and sealed up the entrance to the cave until this day.

As for when the Ark of the Covenant was placed in this cave, the majority opinion is that Solomon, in his God-given wisdom, knew his Temple would be destroyed even as he was having it built, and so he had special caves dug underneath it to hide the Ark and the other Temple artifacts from foreign invaders. Then, centuries later, it was King Josiah who actually had the Ark moved to the cave where it remains today.

The primary Jewish source for these traditions involving Solomon and Josiah is a revered 12th century Rabbi named Moses ben Maimon (commonly known as Maimonides), who died in 1204 A.D. Rabbi Maimonides was the head of the Jewish community in Egypt. In The Book of Temple Service 17, he states that Solomon originally prepared the hiding place and Josiah ended up being the one who used it as he had the Jewish priests take the Ark to it in the years leading up to the Babylonian destruction of the Temple.

To further bolster this tradition among Jews, there is a certain passage in the Jewish Mishnah. The Mishnah is the written collection of what is known as Jewish “oral law.” This “oral law” presumably goes all the way back to God giving Moses oral instructions that were not written down concerning how to carry out the particulars of the Torah (the written books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy). This “oral law” was then passed down from Moses to Joshua and continued on down to the Jewish Rabbis until it was all finally committed to writing in approximately 200 A.D. In one passage of the Mishnah, it states:

“Once when a priest in the second Temple (Zerubbabel’s Temple) saw a block of pavement different from the other floor, he understood that in this place there was an entrance to an underground tunnel and he shared this with a friend. Before he could finish his sharing his life departed. Then they knew assuredly, this was the place where the Ark lay hidden.

Now, as for the validity of this whole theory, we can see that the theory, like so many others, has its strengths and weaknesses. Here are some of the strengths:

  • We are talking about Jewish history here, and Jews know their own history better than anybody. They’ve been studying this stuff and debating it for centuries, and so it makes sense to give them some benefit of the doubt.
  • It is beyond question that there are many caves underneath the Temple Mount. This fact is well known. Even more than that, many of these caves have remained sealed for centuries.
  • It was God who gave Solomon his great wisdom, and so the idea that God would have forewarned him to build secret tunnels underneath the Temple to keep the Ark from being captured isn’t so crazy.
  • The Biblical record does seem to indicate that the Babylonians didn’t take the Ark as part of their plundering of Solomon’s Temple. This must mean, then, that the Jews hid the Ark somewhere, and a cave underneath the Temple would make for a perfect place to hide it.
  • The Bible does tell us that Josiah was a godly king. It also pointedly mentions the Ark being in the Temple during his reign (2 Chronicles 35:3). Perhaps, then, it isn’t a coincidence that the Ark is never mentioned again as being inside Solomon’s Temple, Zerubbabel’s Temple, or Herod’s Temple after Josiah’s death. In my opinion, this is the single strongest piece of evidence for the theory that Josiah hid the Ark in a cave underneath the Temple and it still sits there today.

Okay, now for the weaknesses of the theory:

  • Jewish tradition, like any other man-scented tradition, can be wrong. There is an intellectual arrogance and aloofness to many Jewish rabbis, and it’s the same arrogance and aloofness that kept their forefathers (the Pharisees, Saduccees, and scribes) from embracing Jesus as their Messiah. We should never forget that Jewish rabbis are spiritually lost and, thus, have limited spiritual discernment no matter how much they claim to have.
  • Jewish oral law can be wrong as well. Jesus Himself combated the oral law’s erroneous teachings in reference to Sabbath keeping, ceremonial hand washing, and various other subjects. Therefore, any teaching that comes out of the Mishnah should never be accepted without reservation.
  • King Josiah died in 609 B.C. after a reign of 31 years. But the Babylonians didn’t destroy Solomon’s Temple until 587/586 B.C. That’s a difference of over 20 years. Are we to believe that the Holy of Holies in Solomon’s Temple stood empty of the Ark of the Covenant for over 20 years as the Ark sat in a cave underneath the Temple? Certainly the Babylonian threat was looming against Judah even during Josiah’s reign, but was there any real need to panic and hide the Ark more than 20 years before the Babylonians would actually come to destroy the Temple? That doesn’t make much sense.
  • Even if Josiah (or any of the kings of Judah who followed him) did hide the Ark anywhere to keep it from the Babylonians, why did it have to remain hidden? Why wasn’t it brought back out and placed in the freshly built Zerubbabel’s Temple when a remnant of the Jews returned from their Babylonian exile and rebooted everything about Jerusalem? Even today’s Jewish rabbis believe that the Ark never stood inside either Zerubbabel’s Temple or Herod’s Temple. If it was just sitting there in a cave waiting to be used again, why didn’t they retrieve it at some point? In my opinion, this is the single strongest piece of evidence against the validity of the whole theory.

So, in closing, where do I come down on all of this? Well, if you are just asking me, the theory that the Ark is still in Jerusalem sitting in a sealed cave underneath the Temple Mount is our best guess as to its current location (assuming it still exists at all). With that said, though, I wouldn’t bet a piece of bubble gum that it’s there. The reason I rate this theory ahead of the others has more to do with the inadequacies of the competing theories than the infallibility of this one. Maybe I’ll live long enough to see the Jews somehow get permission to thoroughly excavate underneath the Temple Mount. However, even if they do locate the Ark under there, would they bring it out if they didn’t have a Temple – complete with a Holy of Holies — in which to house it? The answer to that is probably no, which means that I don’t hold out a lot of hope for ever seeing the Ark of the Covenant revealed in my lifetime.

Posted in Series: "The Ark of the Covenant", The Ark of the Covenant | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Knights Templar & the Ark of the Covenant

Posted on July 11, 2017 by russellmckinney

The Ark of the Covenant series (post #8)

To this point in our series on the possible locations of the Ark of the Covenant, we’ve looked at theories couched in the Biblical era. For today’s post, however, we move outside that realm and dive into subject matter that falls within a post-Bible era. Ready? Let’s go.

To get us started, here is a brief timeline for the history of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem:

  • Solomon’s workers complete Solomon’s Temple in 950 B.C.
  • Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylonian army destroys Solomon’s Temple in 587 B.C.
  • The Jews complete a second Temple in 515 B.C. This Temple becomes known as Zerubbabel’s Temple in honor of the Jew who oversaw the project. It is built on the same site where Solomon’s Temple had stood and is laid out in the same basic pattern as Solomon’s Temple, but it isn’t nearly as grand or impressive as Solomon’s Temple had been. This is the Temple that stands in Jerusalem during the 400 years between the last page of the Old Testament and the opening page of the New Testament. All told, it exists even longer than Solomon’s Temple.
  • Following Rome’s conquering of Jerusalem, the Romans install Herod the Great as king over Judea in 38 B.C. Herod is a wicked man, but he loves buildings and architecture. He orders that Zerubbabel’s Temple be enlarged. His ultimate goal is to make it as impressive as Solomon’s had been, a project that will take several decades. Herod himself won’t even live to see its completion. The expanded Temple will become known as Herod’s Temple. This is the Temple in existence during the early life of Jesus.
  • In 70 A.D., the Roman general Titus lays siege to Jerusalem and destroys Herod’s Temple by burning it. There hasn’t been a Temple in Jerusalem since.

Here now is where we move outside the comfortable confines of scripture. The Roman empire eventually grew so large that it became impossible to govern effectively. Just getting messages from Rome, the capital city, to the empire’s outer regions took weeks. So, the radical decision was made to split the empire into two halves. The empire’s western half would remain based in Rome, while the eastern half would be based in Byzantium (which would eventually be renamed Constantinople). The city of Jerusalem fell under the realm of Byzantium (Constantinople).

Thus began a timeline of centuries in which Jerusalem was passed back and forth by a series of competing armies. Mind you that each conquest involved a major military endeavor involving thousands upon thousands of soldiers, not to mention untold bloodshed. The military timeline goes as follows:

  • In 614 A.D., the Persians capture control of Jerusalem from the Romans (Byzantines).
  • In 629 A.D., the Romans (Byzantines) recapture Jerusalem from the Persians.
  • In 638 A.D., the Muslim Caliph Omar I captures Jerusalem from the Romans (Byzantines) and declares the Temple Mount (the site of Solomon’s Temple, Zerubbabel’s Temple, and Herod’s Temple) a sacred place for Islam. Thus, Jerusalem becomes an Islamic city. The Muslims rule over the city for the next 461 years, and in 691 A.D. The Dome of the Rock, a sacred sanctuary for Islam, is built on the site of the Temple Mount.
  • In 1099 A.D., Pope Urban II launches The First Crusade, led by Godfrey of Bouilion, to regain control of Jerusalem from the Muslims. The Crusade proves successful and Jerusalem comes under the control of the Crusaders. The following year Baldwin I, the brother of Godfrey of Bouilion, is crowned king of Jerusalem, the city is declared “Christian,” and The Dome of the Rock is converted into a church named Templum Domini (Temple of the Lord).
  • In 1187 A.D., the Muslim leader Saladin captures Jerusalem from the Crusaders.

Believe me, the timeline doesn’t stop there, but that’s as far as I need to go to say what I need to say in this post. During the 87 or so years the first Crusaders held Jerusalem many groups of Christians from across Western Europe visited the city. These Christians needed to be guaranteed safe passage, and so sometime around 1118 A.D. a French knight named Hugues de Payens founded a military order established for this purpose. This order was originally called The Poor Knights of the Temple of King Solomon, but it became more famously known as The Knights Templar.

In 1129 A.D., The Knights Templar received the formal endorsement of the Catholic Church. This caused new recruits and a ton of money to begin pouring into the order from all across Europe. This allowed The Knights Templar to establish new chapters throughout Western Europe. In addition to being highly trained, fierce warriors, The Knights Templar set up a network of banks and became a major source for loans for European nobles. They also owned a large fleet of ships and actually bought the island of Cyprus.

But did they also do any excavating under The Dome of the Rock/The Temple Mount in Jerusalem? Well, that’s the story that some people tell. And as part of those excavations did they come into possession of The Ark of the Covenant? Well, again, that’s the story that some people tell. From there the story morphs into a dozen other stories, depending upon which one you believe, that have The Knights Templar hiding out the Ark. They hid it in Scotland’s Rosslyn Chapel. They hid it in England’s Temple Herdewyke. They hid it in France’s Cathedral of Our Lady of Chartres. They hid it at the bottom of an elaborate pit on Oak Island in Canada’s Nova Scotia. You get the idea.

Could any one of these stories actually be true? I suppose. I myself like to keep any open mind on such things. But does one of them have to be true? Nope. Every last one could be as nutty as a fruitcake. When everything is said and done, the major problem I have with any story in which The Knights Templar discover the Ark in Jerusalem and spirit it away to some secret location comes down to this: It involves three MAJOR presuppositions right out of the chute. They are:

  • Presupposition #1: Each story presupposes that the Ark somehow ended up hidden at some point under the Temple Mount. But this assumption itself raises so many questions. Had the Ark been hidden there since the Babylonian destruction of Solomon’s Temple? Had it never sat inside the Holy of Holies of Zerubbabel’s Temple or later on Herod’s Temple? (Did you know there is no Bible evidence of it ever being in either one?) Had it sat inside Zerubbabel’s Temple and Herod’s Temple but been hidden before Titus and his Roman army destroyed Herod’s Temple in 70 A.D.? So many question, so few answers.
  • Presupposition #2: Each story presupposes that The Knights Templar actually discovered the Ark and moved it somewhere. Obviously, even if they were trying to find it there’s no guarantee they did.
  • Presupposition #3: Each story presupposes that God would have allowed anyone other than the Levitical Kohathite priests of the Jewish priestly order to not only move the Ark from under the Temple Mount but actually transport it completely out of Israel and into a foreign land. Scripturally speaking, such a thing flies directly in the face of the Bible’s accounts of the Philistines trying to keep the Ark in Philistia (1 Samuel chapters 5 and 6) and David trying to move it into Jerusalem without using those priests (2 Samuel chapter 6). Each of those stories serves as proof positive that the Ark is a dangerous thing. I don’t care how fierce a warrior you are or how holy you think your cause is, you don’t just walk up to the Ark of the Covenant and start handling it.

And so, in conclusion, I just can’t run off too far with any theory involving The Knights Templar doing anything with the Ark of the Covenant. Certainly it’s all fodder for interesting books, movies, television programs, and internet sites. I get that. I myself have watched every episode and counting of the reality t.v. series “The Curse of Oak Island.” Furthermore, if those two brothers finally get to the bottom of that pit and actually retrieve the Ark of the Covenant from it, I’ll stand and applaud their discovery, no doubt about it. But I’m not really expecting that to happen. Even if it was The Knights Templar who buried something down there, my guess is that it’s not the Ark.

Posted in Series: "The Ark of the Covenant", The Ark of the Covenant | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is the Ark of the Covenant on Mount Nebo?

Posted on July 6, 2017 by russellmckinney

The Ark of the Covenant series (post #7)

The Apocrypha is a collection of 15 books that have a long association with scripture. They were written between approximately 400 B.C. and the time of Jesus. These books are not included in modern Protestant Bibles, but they are included in the Vulgate (the Catholic Latin Bible) by way of an Appendix. The official Catholic view, as settled as a doctrine of faith at the Council of Trent in 1546 A.D., is that 12 of the Apocrypha’s 15 books should be considered as canonical scripture. The three that were deemed doubtful were 1 Esdras, 2 Esdras, and the Prayer of Manasseh.

While it’s true that no part of the Apocrypha is currently considered holy scripture by non-Catholic Christians, the entire Apocrypha was actually included in the 1611 King James translation. The books were positioned between the last page of the Old Testament and the first page of the New Testament. I mention this merely to point out that the books of the Apocrypha, particularly the ones granted full approval by the Catholic church at the Council of Trent, have traditionally rated a little higher with Christians than other non-canonical books that didn’t make the cut of the Protestant Bible.

As for me, I don’t believe that any of the books of the Apocrypha should be considered holy scripture. I have what in my opinion are solid reasons for this belief, and I cited several of them in a previous post (post #4) from this series. I won’t rehash all that, but I just wanted to restate my opinion that the books of the Apocrypha are not inspired by God, not 100% accurate, and thus not thoroughly reliable.

Okay, fine, but why am I bringing all this up? I’m doing it because one of the Aprocryphal books, 2 Maccabees, makes the claim that the prophet Jeremiah hid the Ark of the Covenant in a cave somewhere atop Mount Nebo to prevent the Babylonian army from acquiring it. The passage reads as follows:

It was also in the same document that the prophet (Jeremiah), having received an oracle, ordered that the tent and the ark should follow with him, and that he went out to the mountain where Moses had gone up and seen the inheritance of God. Jeremiah came and found a cave-dwelling, and he brought there the tent, the ark, and the altar of incense; then he sealed up the entrance. Some of those who followed him came up intending to mark the way, but could not find it. When Jeremiah learned of it, he rebuked them and declared: “The place shall remain unknown until God gathers his people together again and shows his mercy. Then the Lord will disclose these things, and the glory of the Lord and the cloud will appear, as they were shown in the case of Moses, and as Solomon asked that the place should be specially consecrated.” 2 Maccabees 2:4-8 (New Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition)

The descriptive phrase “the mountain where Moses had gone up and seen the inheritance of God” refers to Mount Nebo (Deuteronomy 32:48-52; 34:1-4). God did not permit Moses to lead the people of Israel into the promised land of Canaan (Numbers 20:1-13), but He did grant him the privilege of climbing to the top of Mount Nebo and looking over across into Canaan. Mount Nebo is located just east of the northern end of the Dead Sea. The Bible refers to this country as Moab, but today we call it Jordan. Moses was also buried by God in an unknown grave in a valley in this same area (Deuteronomy 34:5-6).

So, according to the passage from 2 Maccabees, three historical artifacts are hidden in a cave with a sealed up entrance somewhere on Mount Nebo. Artifact #1 is the Ark of the Covenant. Artifact #2 is the Altar of Incense from Solomon’s Temple. The Altar of Incense was the small Altar that sat directly in front of the veil (curtain) that separated the Holy of Holies room from the rest of the Temple. Artifact #3 is the “tent.” This could be a reference to the original Tabernacle complex itself, which the Bible last places at Gibeon (1 Chronicles 16:39; 2 Chronicles 1:1-6). More likely, though, it’s a reference to the special tent wherein David housed the Ark of the Covenant in Jerusalem for the entirety of his reign before the Temple was built (2 Samuel 6:16-17).

Now, to be fair, the idea of Jeremiah hiding these three items atop this specific mountain does make some scriptural sense. Consider the following facts:

  1. The ministry of the prophet Jeremiah spanned the entirety of the Babylonian invasion and the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. If any prophet was going to receive a word from God to remove the Ark from the Temple’s Holy of Holies and hide it somewhere, Jeremiah would definitely have been the man.
  2. Since the Bible never mentions the Ark again after the destruction of the Temple, and since the Bible doesn’t mention the Ark being taken to Babylon either, it certainly isn’t out of the question that Jeremiah did something with it.
  3. Moses was the man to whom God gave the instructions for the building of the Ark. Therefore, it would make for nice symmetry if he and the Ark both ended up buried in secret, hidden locations in the area of Mount Nebo.

The problem, however, with the Mount Nebo theory is that the book of 2 Maccabees simply isn’t reliable. This is the same book, mind you, that teaches in 2 Maccabees 12:43 that money can be offered as a sacrifice for the sins of the dead. (By the way, the Catholics like that passage because it can be used to support their false doctrine of purgatory.) Also, 2 Maccabees 15:11-14 teaches that deceased saints are in heaven interceding for people on earth. Trust me, the only intercession that is being done by anybody in heaven is Jesus interceding for Christians: Hebrews 4:14-16; Hebrews 8:1-2; and 1 John 2:1-2.

Really, though, even if we grant 2 Maccabees full scriptural authority, there is still a serious problem with the passage in question. The passage says the cave wherein the Ark sits “shall remain unknown until God gathers his people together again and shows his mercy.” Obviously, then, everything hinges on the identification of when it is that God “gathers his people together again.” Well, let’s talk about that.

One possible fulfillment of that supposed prophecy occurred on May 14, 1948. That is when the United Nations formally recognized Israel once again as a nation. At that time, in the immediate aftermath of World War II and the Nazi Holocaust, millions of Jews started pouring back into Israel. Therefore, that date might possibly fit the bill of God gathering his people together again and showing His mercy. But can we really claim that date as the starting point for the prophecy when over 69 years have now passed and the hidden location of the Ark still hasn’t been disclosed?

A second possible option is that the supposed prophecy speaks of saved Israel dwelling in its land during Christ’s 1,000 year reign upon the earth. Admittedly, that does make for a better interpretation than the May 14, 1948, date. However, in Jeremiah 3:14-18 the Bible teaches that in the days of Christ’s millennial reign the Ark of the Covenant will not be mentioned, come to mind, or be visited. It won’t be needed anymore because Jesus Himself will personally be sitting upon His throne in Jerusalem. Certainly this is a wonderful thought for those of us who are looking forward to Christ’s reign, but it sure does blow a hole in the idea that the Ark will be excavated from some supposed cave at the end of the tribulation period just before Jesus begins that reign.

In conclusion, when we really add everything up and take it all into account, there are just too many problems with the Mount Nebo theory to deem it credible. As with most theories regarding the current location of the Ark, the theory has enough strong points to make it worthy of discussion and possibly even investigation. In the end, though, we just can’t ignore the fact that the theory’s source, 2 Maccabees, is dubious to say the least.

Think of it this way: If we can’t trust The Kebra Nagast when it tells us the Ark is in Ethiopia, we can’t trust 2 Maccabees when it tells us the Ark is in a cave on Mount Nebo. Just because a piece of writing is old and weaves an interesting tale, that doesn’t make the words holy scripture. So, for now, we’ll cross Mount Nebo off our list of possible sites and keep on looking. I promise you that we have several other potential locations to consider. Next time we’ll look at one that doesn’t even have one thing to do with scripture. That, I hope, is enough of a tease to whet your appetite and keep you reading.

Posted in Series: "The Ark of the Covenant", The Ark of the Covenant | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments