A Little Church Humor for the Day After Christmas

Because I’m pretty much fried — in body and brain — from a month’s worth of all things Christmas, I thought it would be nice if I let others do the writing today. A good friend of mine sent me a couple of pages of jokes a while back, and I’m just going to pull out some of my favorites and share them with you. Enjoy.

*A Sunday School teacher challenged her children to take some time on Sunday afternoon to write a letter to God. They were to bring their letters to class the following Sunday. One little boy wrote, “Dear God, We had a good time at church today. Wish you could have been there.”

*Another Sunday School teacher was teaching her young students about Noah and the Ark. When she asked them what they thought Noah did to pass the time aboard the Ark, she got no reply. Finally, she remembered that there weren’t any fish in the Ark and said, “Maybe he did a lot of fishing.” To that, one little boy gave her a funny look and said, “I don’t think so. It’s kinda hard to fish with just two worms.”

*One man said to another man at a gathering, “I’ve been racking my brain, but I can’t seem to place you. But you do look like someone I’ve seen a lot, someone I don’t particularly like. But I can’t tell you why. Isn’t that strange?” “There’s nothing strange about it,” said the other man. “You have seen me a lot, and I know exactly why you resent me. For two years I passed the collection plate in your church.”

*The church service was over, and the pastor stood at the door shaking hands with the people as they left. A woman shook his hand and said, “You know what? I don’t think I’ll come back to this church any more. Every time I come you people sing the same two songs. You either sing Silent Night or He Arose.” (Get it?)

*Deer-hunting season began one Saturday. The next day, at the close of the Sunday morning service, a pastor said to his congregation, “Raise your hand if you bagged a deer yesterday.” Not one hand was lifted. Puzzled, the pastor said, “I don’t understand this. I know that many of you went hunting yesterday, and I specifically asked God to bless your deer.” After a brief pause, one hunter replied, “Well, preacher, He did. They’re all safe. Next time, ask Him to bless our aim.”

*(Here’s one that is particularly relevant to this time of year.) The following conversation occurred when an IRS agent visited a pastor:

  • agent: “Pastor, do you know a Mr. Karten?”
  • pastor: “Yes, I do.”
  • agent: “Is he a member of your congregation?”
  • pastor: “Yes, he is.”
  • agent: “And did Mr. Karten really donate $100,000 to your church, as he has claimed on his tax return?”
  • pastor: “I assure you he will!”
Posted in Church, Giving, Humor, Sunday School | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Christian Verses” Podcast: Isaiah 7:14

Merry Christmas everybody! A couple of weeks ago I preached a sermon on Christ’s virgin birth. Along about the same time Malcolm taught a class on the topic. So, we decided to pool our efforts and devote a podcast to the topic. In the podcast, Malcolm gets things going by quoting some interesting statistics regarding professing Christians’ belief (or lack of it) in the virgin birth. Then we go from there to delve deeper into the discussion. To hear the podcast, just click on the link below. And, again, MERRY CHRISTMAS!

https://soundcloud.com/user-185243867/the-essential-virgin-birthcv2019015

Posted in "Christian Verses" podcast, Christ's Birth, Christmas, Virgin Birth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Your Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series (post #7)

That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (John 1:9-13, N.K.J.V.)

In regards to the news of Christ’s birth, you can talk all you want about the reactions of Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, the wise men, Herod, and the Jewish religious leaders. In the end, though, the only reaction that gets into your wheelhouse is your reaction. Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the wise men all reacted appropriately to Jesus becoming flesh and dwelling among men, while Herod and the Jewish religious leaders reacted inappropriately to that incarnation. But what about you? How have you reacted to it?

Even more importantly than how you have reacted to the news of Christ’s birth is the matter of how you have reacted to the news that He: grew up, lived a sinless life, performed miracles that proved His divinity, died on a Roman cross as the sacrifice for your sins, arose from the dead, ascended back to heaven, and right now offers salvation to you if you will (as our text passage says) receive Him as your personal Savior. Obviously, that sweet little baby in the manger didn’t stay an infant and didn’t stay in that manger. No, He became an adult who did business with the human race, and now the human race must do business with Him one way or the other by either receiving Him or rejecting Him.

This idea of receiving Jesus goes hand in hand with the Bible’s teaching that salvation is a gift that can only be received or rejected. Consider the following passages (all from the N.K.J.V.):

  • For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 6:23)
  • For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works lest anyone should boast. (Ephesians 2:8-9)
  • Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift! (2 Corinthians 9:15)

You see, the Bible so inseparably links Jesus with the gift of salvation that the two become one and the same. The only way to receive the gift is to receive Jesus. As evidence of this, think about John 3:16. That verse teaches that God loved the world so much that He gave it a gift. But what was that gift? It was a person: God’s Son, Jesus. Similarly, in John 4:10, Jesus tells a Samaritan woman, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water” (N.K.J.V.). Do you see how the “living water” (a description of salvation) and Jesus are the same? The only way the woman could receive the living water was for her to receive Jesus.

Actually, the Bible uses various terminologies to describe how a person gets saved. Many passages talk about believing in Jesus (John 3:16, Romans 10:14, etc.), but other passages talk about putting faith in Him (Romans 3:21-31, Colossians 1:3-5, etc.), trusting in Him (Ephesians 1:11-14, 1 Timothy 4:10), calling upon Him (Romans 10:9-13), or coming to Him (John 5:39-40, John 6:35-37). Revelation 3:20 even describes it as opening the door after hearing Jesus knock.

It’s not that these passages are describing different types of salvation experiences. The point is that the genuine salvation experience will incorporate all of these descriptions. This brings us back to the terminology of our text passage. What does it mean for a person to receive Jesus? It means, in regards to salvation, that the person believes in Him, puts faith in Him, trusts in Him, calls upon Him, comes to Him, and opens the door to Him.

This Christmas, or any other time of the year for that matter, you need to make sure that you have truly received the gift of salvation that is Jesus Christ. Personally, whenever I present the gospel, I usually use the words “believe in Him” in reference to what the individual needs to do concerning Jesus. I favor this terminology because it’s the one most frequently used in the New Testament. As I’ve pointed out, though, any of the terminologies will work if the decision itself is real. It’s the decision’s authenticity that is paramount, not the specific wording.

But make no mistake, that decision or lack of it is what determines each individual’s eternal destiny. I’m happy to report that all scriptural indications are that Mary, Joseph, those shepherds, and those wise men didn’t just rightly receive the news about Christ’s birth; they also rightly received Him. Again I ask you, have you done this? If you haven’t, then I’m not happy to report that you’ll spend this Christmas abiding under the condemnation of God (John 3:18). But if you have, then you’ll spend it as God means for you to spend it. The choice is yours to make because the gift has already been given to you in the person of Jesus Christ. All that’s left to be decided now is, will you reject the gift or receive it?

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Religious Leaders’ Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #6)

Imagine that you have waited your whole life for John Doe to arrive. When you were a child, your parents told you, “One day John Doe will come to our people, and when He gets here He will solve all our problems.” When you attended school, your teachers told you, “We are waiting for John Doe to arrive, and when He does He will lead our people into an age of peace, prosperity, and prominence in the world.” When you became an adult, other adults told you, “Surely it is almost time for John Doe to finally come and save us.”

Then one day, out of the clear blue, some strangers show up in your city and ask to be shown to the site where John Doe was recently born. How do they know He’s been born? They know it because they’ve seen His sign, a miraculous star, in the nighttime sky. To them, the question is not whether or not John Doe has been born. The only question is, “Where is He?”

Well, you don’t know these strange men, but you do know the answer to their question. According to what you’ve always been taught, John Doe is supposed to be born in Bethlehem. Bethlehem, that’s the little town that is located only about five miles from where you stand. Okay, so what’s your next move?

Based upon what you have been taught your entire life, shouldn’t you be excited about the possibility that John Doe has at last been born? Shouldn’t you be encouraged by the news of His birth? Most importantly, shouldn’t you follow those strange men to Bethlehem? Better yet, shouldn’t you say to them, “Follow me, I’ll show you the way there. I want to see this child myself”? That’s what common sense would dictate you should do with such news.

This brings us to the Jewish ruling elite of Herod’s day. When those wise men from the East showed up at Herod’s palace and asked him about the whereabouts of the newborn king, Herod immediately called in Jerusalem’s chief priests and scribes and asked them for the answer. And they gave it to him by quoting the Micah 5:2 prophecy about Bethlehem. But, after giving that answer, those men simply faded back into the shadows, never to be heard from again (at least as far as the story of Christ’s birth goes).

Isn’t that incredible? Isn’t that shocking? Isn’t that sad? Those Jewish religious leaders weren’t interested enough or even curious enough to make the five-mile trip to at least investigate the validity of the claim. As far as we know, they were content to just return to the “business as usual” of their little world of religion and wait to see if any more was heard about the Messiah being born.

The Bible doesn’t tell us the reason why those men reacted that way. Perhaps they were terrified that Herod would see them get excited about the birth of the Messiah. After all, it’s not like they couldn’t have guessed that he would want to kill the newborn king. On the other hand, perhaps they inwardly hoped that the Messiah hadn’t been born. After all, they knew that if He really was on the scene, He would create a tidal wave that would come crashing down into their comfortable lives and positions of authority among the Jews.

While I don’t doubt that those religious leaders were terrified of Herod’s wrath, it’s impossible for me to believe that their reaction to the news of Christ’s birth didn’t have plenty to do with them potentially losing their lofty status among the Jews. Along these lines, it doesn’t help their case that, some 30 years later, when Jesus began His public ministry, these same groups hounded Him at every turn, tried to discredit Him, and ultimately worked through the Romans to get Him crucified. That tells us all we need to know about how they felt about Him.

In this way, those religious leaders symbolize all the people who won’t embrace Jesus as Savior because they know that doing so will bring major change to their lives. Show me a lost person who really, really, really likes the way his or her life is going, and I’ll show you someone who isn’t a top candidate to come under the Lordship of Christ. Seriously, Christian, if you try to witness to a lost person by saying, “Jesus can give you a new life,” and that person’s comeback is, “But I like the life I have now,” you’re probably not going to win that person to Jesus. That’s just reality.

What many lost people instinctively understand is that Jesus won’t play second fiddle or be a co-pilot. If He gets invited into a life, He’s taking over that life completely. Furthermore, the individual’s personal comfort won’t be nearly as high on Christ’s priority list as it is on the person’s. Yes, Jesus will help the individual in whatever way is needed, but then He’ll start to mold and shape that individual to be used in His service. Unfortunately, most people simply don’t have much interest in that kind of life.

At the bottom line, those Jewish religious leaders saw Jesus as a threat — a threat to their way of life, a threat to their place in society, a threat to their power over the people. It’s no wonder they had no interest in seeing Him. Even if they had traveled with those wise men to Bethlehem, they certainly wouldn’t have joined them in worshiping Him. It’s much more likely they would have ridiculed the idea of the virgin birth and dismissed Jesus as being nothing more than the product of premarital sex between Joseph and Mary.

You know, in many ways, the reaction from those religious leaders was about as bad as Herod’s reaction. The only difference was, they didn’t add in the effort to kill Jesus. But then again, that would come about three decades later, wouldn’t it? For that matter, the chances are that a few of those same chief priests and scribes who first heard the news about Christ’s birth were still alive to play an active role in His death. And if that was indeed the case, it meant that they helped finish what Herod had started. I wonder if they ever noticed the connection. They probably didn’t, did they? That would have required far more spiritual discernment than their warped minds were capable of generating.

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Herod’s Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #5)

When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. (Matthew 2:3-4, N.K.J.V.)

Thus far in our series on the reactions to the news of Christ’s birth, everyone’s reaction has been positive. Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the wise men all responded beautifully to the news. But now we come to a man who got it wrong. Actually, he couldn’t have responded any worse. His name was Herod the Great, and he was a real piece of work.

Once the Roman empire had gained control of the land of Israel, the Romans needed handpicked leaders to rule over it for them. One of those chosen rulers was Antipater, whom Julius Caesar installed as procurator of Judea in 47 B.C. Antipater was from Idumea, which was located in the larger general region of ancient Edom. Edom, of course, was historically famous as the land of Esau, Jacob’s twin brother. Antipater, through his wife Cyprus (who was the daughter of an Arab sheik), fathered Herod, the second of his five sons.

Shortly after being named procurator of Judea, Antipater used his influence to get his oldest son, Phasaelus, appointed the governor of Jerusalem and Herod appointed as the governor of Galilee. Herod was 25 years old at the time. Following the murder of Antipater in 43 B.C., Rome’s Marc Antony appointed Phasaelus and Herod as tetrarchs to rule over the Jews. Following Phasaelus’ death, not to mention a great deal of military and political fighting, Marc Antony named Herod as the sole ruler over the Jews in 37 B.C. Herod then reigned as “king” over the Jews from 37 B.C. until his death in 4 B.C.

Herod wasn’t a pure-blood Jew, but he was half-Idumean, and the Idumeans did practice a nominal version of Judaism. This gave him an understanding of the Jewish people that allowed him to keep them somewhat appeased under his rule. The most prime example of his efforts to win Jewish approval was his massive reworking of the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. Under Herod, that temple was restored, renovated, and outright rebuilt to become even larger and more opulent than Jerusalem’s original temple of Solomon had been. 

Still, we must never forget that Herod was a moral monster. Putting it simply, his god was power and he would do anything to gain it and keep it. All told, he married ten different wives, each one for political purposes, and fathered multiple children through them. By the end of his life, however, in his unceasing efforts to stamp out all rivals and keep his throne secure, he had at various times ordered the executions of one of these wives, her two brothers, and three of these sons. This explains why Caesar Augustus once famously said of Herod, “I’d sooner be Herod’s swine than Herod’s son.”

Keep in mind, now, that Herod was the guy who was ruling over the Jews when those wise men showed up in Jerusalem and asked, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?” Talk about asking the wrong man the wrong question! Herod surely thought, “Wait a minute, I’m the King of the Jews!” As our text says in the K.J.V., the N.K.J.V., the N.A.S.V., and the E.S.V., he was “troubled” (Matthew 2:3). Other translations render his reaction as “disturbed” (N.I.V.), “deeply disturbed” (H.C.S.B., N.L.T.), “alarmed” (N.E.T.), and “frightened” (N.R.S.V.). I think all of these descriptions accurately describe how Herod felt when he first heard the news that a King of the Jews had been born. He certainly wasn’t glad to get the information. Interestingly, he wasn’t mad, either. He was just deeply troubled and more than a little afraid as he instinctively viewed this baby as a major threat to his throne.

Herod’s next move was to summons some of the Jewish priests and scribes to his palace and ask them, “Where is the Christ (Messiah) supposed to be born?” (Mathew 2:4). The fact that Herod knew enough to ask such a question shows that somewhere along the line he had heard about a Messiah who was supposed to come and rule over Israel. That prophecy was, after all, common knowledge among the Jews. And so those priests and scribes didn’t have to race back to the temple and consult their ancient texts to find the answer Herod needed. They knew full well that the prophet Micah had prophesied that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem (Matthew 2:5-6).

Now it was time for Herod to enact his plan to use the wise men in his sinister attempt to execute the newborn king. So, he called them back to him and gave them the answer, “Bethlehem.” Then he added in the lie, “Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him bring word back to me, that I may come and worship Him also” (Matthew 2:8). Like I said, Herod was a real piece of work. He had every intention of letting those good men unwittingly play the role of bounty hunters in his service.

Thankfully, God stepped in and thwarted that plan. Shortly after the wise men found Jesus, presented their gifts to Him, and worshiped Him, God warned them by way of a dream not to report back to Herod. They promptly obeyed those instructions and returned to their homeland by way of a route that didn’t backtrack them through Jerusalem. Furthermore, not long after the wise men had left the little family, an angel appeared to Joseph in a dream and told him, “Arise, take the young Child and His mother, flee to Egypt, and stay there until I bring you word, for Herod will seek the young Child to destroy Him” (Matthew 2:13, N.K.J.V.). Like the wise men, Joseph immediately did as he was told and took the family south into Egypt by night (Matthew 2:14-15), and they remained in Egypt until Herod’s death a short while later.

As for Herod, once he figured out that the wise men weren’t going to return to him, he flew into an absolute rage and issued a decree that every male child two years old or younger in Bethlehem and its surrounding districts should be killed (Matthew 2:16). This heinous act has become known as “the massacre of the innocents.” You might ask, “Why did the decree extend to children up to two years of age?” The Bible leaves no doubt about that answer. Matthew 2:16 says that Herod chose this age “according to the time which he had determined from the wise men.” This kicks back to Matthew 2:7, where we’re told that he “determined from them what time the star appeared.” This leaves us to believe that the star first appeared on the night Jesus was born, and it took the wise men several months — perhaps as long as two years — to arrive in Jerusalem.

Getting back to Herod’s slaughter of those precious children, did you know that even that sadistic crime fulfilled prophecy? The prophecy was from Jeremiah 31:15, and under the inspiration of God Matthew applied it to “the massacre of the innocents” (Matthew 2:17-18). We don’t know how many children died as a result of Herod’s attempt to kill Jesus. Since Bethlehem and its surrounding districts didn’t make for a very large area, there probably weren’t that many children two years old or younger who lived there at that time. Needless to say, though, if there was even one, that was one too many to die because of the insane workings of Herod’s mind.

In closing, let me say that even though Herod the Great is long gone, there are still plenty of people around today who despise the news of Christ’s birth about as much as he did. Satanists certainly don’t get excited about that birth. Neither do atheists and Jews. For that matter, the world’s billions of lost people don’t truly have much to celebrate at Christmas, either. The truth is that one day they will be shocked to find that the babe in the manger has become their eternal Judge and Jury (John 5:22; Acts 17:30-31), and they’ll spend eternity in the same lake of fire as Herod (Revelation 20:11-15). Is that too blunt for you? Well, forgive me, but this is what will ultimately become of any and all who reject Jesus. That’s God’s word, not mine. And in the end, His is the only one that  counts.

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Wise Men’s Reaction

Series: “Reactions to Christ’s Birth” (post #4)

Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” (Matthew 2:1-2, N.K.J.V.)

They weren’t kings. They weren’t from the Orient. They probably didn’t arrive in Bethlehem until several months (as much as a couple of years) after the night of Christ’s birth. They didn’t follow the star night by night as they made their journey. And the only reason to think there were just three of them rests upon the fact that they brought three gifts. Still, though, all these misconceptions not withstanding, the wise men’s visit to Jesus has classically become an integral part of the Christmas story.

The Biblical term “wise men” translates the Greek noun magi, which is the plural of the Greek noun magos. As a matter of fact, the N.I.V. translation just leaves the Greek word untranslated and goes with “Magi” in verses 1, 7, and 16 of Matthew chapter 2. In Bible times, the Magi were a group of highly educated men who served as advisers to kings in countries such as Babylon and Persia. For example, after Babylon’s King Nebuchadnezzar had strange dreams one night, he asked “the magicians, the astrologers, the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans” (Daniel 2:1-13, N.K.J.V.) to tell him what he had dreamed. It’s likely that those men were Magi. Some scholars believe the Magi were the priests of the Zoroastrian religion that was practiced in ancient Babylon.

The Magi were masters of various fields of study, particularly astronomy. Such men would be impressed by the appearance of a new star in the nighttime sky. They would be even more impressed if they could somehow interpret that star to be the sign of the birth of a prophesied King. Now we’re getting to the heart of why those Magi made the trip from their homeland to Jerusalem/Bethlehem.

Matthew 2:1 tells us they were from the East. In the Bible, all directions are given in relation to Jerusalem, and so the Magi came from a land east of Jerusalem. While it’s true that the Orient (Japan, China, Korea, etc.) is located to the far east of Jerusalem, Babylon is located directly east of it. Unfortunately, the wise men’s words, “…we have seen His star in the East…” have been erroneously understood to mean that the star was located in the sky to the east of them. If that had been the case, it would have placed the star somewhere over the Orient rather than over Bethlehem. No, what the wise men meant was, “We were in the east when we saw His star in the western sky.”

We can’t say with absolute certainty what prompted the Magi to associate that new star with the birth of a king, but it seems obvious that they had access to certain prophecies of the Old Testament. This makes perfect sense in light of the fact that the people of Israel had a definite history with the Babylonians and Persians. Babylon’s Nebuchadnezzar had conquered Israel’s southern kingdom of Judah centuries earlier and had relocated the Jews to Babylon. Seven decades later, when the Medo-Persian empire had conquered the Babylonian empire, Persia’s Cyrus the Great had allowed the Jews to return to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple and reclaim their status as a nation. While approximately 50,000 Jews had taken up this monumental task, millions of Jews had remained in Babylon for the rest of their lives. According to the Bible’s record, the prophet Daniel, who was very old by the time of Cyrus, was one of those who remained in Babylon. Surely, then, the Magi had read the ancient writings of Daniel.

The Magi might also have known about the prophet Balaam’s prophecy from Numbers 24:17, which said, “A Star shall come out of Jacob; A Scepter shall rise out of Israel.” This would explain why they showed up in Jerusalem and specifically asked Herod the Great, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?” One prophecy the Magi evidently didn’t know about was Micah 5:2, which foretold that the “Ruler in Israel” would come forth from “Bethlehem Ephrathah.” If they had known that prophecy, which gave that singular location, they would no doubt have journeyed straight to Bethlehem rather than stopped five miles short in Jerusalem and basically asked for further directions.

This gets us into the matter of the star. While it is commonly believed that the wise men followed the star night by night as they journeyed, this isn’t the story the gospel of Matthew tells. What Matthew describes reads like this:

  • The Magi saw the new star, coupled that appearance up with prophecy they knew, and concluded that they should journey to Jerusalem to find the newborn King of the Jews. (Matthew 2:1-2)
  • They arrived at the palace of Herod the Great, Rome’s handpicked ruler over Judea, and asked him about the location of the birth of the King of the Jews. (Matthew 2:1-2)
  • Herod asked the Jewish priests and scribes where their Messiah was prophesied to be born and was told, “Bethlehem.” (Matthew 2:3-6)
  • Herod sent the Magi on their way to make the five-mile trip to Bethlehem, and as soon as they left Herod’s palace the star which had started them on their long journey reappeared and stood directly over where the young Jesus was. (Matthew 2:7-9)
  • When the Magi saw the star again they rejoiced with exceedingly great joy. (Matthew 2:10)

The Magi then made the short trip to the house where Jesus was. Not only does the story say that at that time Jesus was in a “house” rather than a “manger,” it also uses a different Greek word (paidion, Matthew 2:11) than Luke’s word (brephos, Luke 2:12,16) to describe Him. These two pieces of evidence indicate that some time had passed between the night of Christ’s birth and the night the Magi visited Him.

Another piece of evidence for this conclusion is the fact that a little over a month after Jesus’ birth, when Joseph and Mary took Him to the Jerusalem temple to dedicate Him to the Lord, Mary offered the Mosaic law’s more affordable sacrifice of two small turtledoves or pigeons (Luke 2:24) rather than the more expensive sacrifice of a lamb (Leviticus 12:6-8). Surely Joseph and Mary could have afforded a lamb for a sacrifice if the Magi had already brought their gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh to Jesus. For that matter, Matthew 2:1 begins the whole story of the Magi by plainly saying, “Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea….”

As for how much time actually elapsed between the night of Christ’s birth and the arrival of the Magi, it’s impossible to nail it down precisely. If we assume the star first appeared on the very night Jesus was born, and if we assume the star’s appearance came as a surprise to the Magi, it would have taken several weeks (if not months) for them to even  prepare for the long journey from their homeland to Jerusalem. Furthermore, if they decided to travel by means of a large caravan, which is probable, that would have only increased their preparation time. And then there was the journey itself. As a prime example of how long such a journey would have required, we know that it took Ezra and the group he led four months to make the almost thousand-mile trek from Babylon to Jerusalem (Ezra 7:1-10).

If the Bible provides us with one clue as to the whole question of the Magi’s arrival time, it can be found in a certain answer they gave to Herod. When he asked them when the star had first appeared (Matthew 2:7, 16), apparently their response was, “Two years ago.” I say that because in the wake of their answer, Herod had all of the male children two years old and younger killed in Bethlehem and its surrounding districts (Matthew 2:16). The only other possible explanation for Herod choosing that particular age would be that he wanted to be extremely thorough in his efforts to kill the new king.

At any rate, whatever all the exact details of the story were, what we’re primarily looking for is the Magi’s response to the news that Jesus had been born. And what was that response? Well, it’s obvious, isn’t it? As soon as they got the news by way of that star, they loaded up, left their homeland, and made the trip of many hundreds of miles to find Jesus, worship Him, and bring Him gifts. It’s hard to imagine a better reaction than that!

For the record, I fully expect that like Mary, Joseph, and those shepherds who were on the scene at the manger that first night, the wise men can be correctly classified as saved believers. And if that is indeed a correct assessment, it means that their souls are in heaven right now. It’s no wonder that the old cliche says, “Wise men still seek Him.” So, in light of all this, I guess the only question left to be asked is, “Just how wise are we today?”

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Christmas Traditions, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Shepherds’ Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #3)

Then the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which will be to all people. For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be the sign to you: You will find a Babe wrapped in swaddling cloths, lying in a manger.” (Luke 2:10-12. N.K.J.V.)

Some of the greatest characters from the Old Testament spent time shepherding. The list includes Abel, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, and Amos. Even more impressive is the fact that in passages such as Genesis 49:24, Psalm 23:1-4, Psalm 80:1, Isaiah 40:11, and Ezekiel 34:31 God labels Himself as a Shepherd.

By the time of Christ’s birth, however, the minds of Israel’s religious elite had become so radically different from God’s that shepherds were considered the riffraff of society. First, shepherds were considered ignorant because they had never been schooled in Jewish law. Second, they were considered ceremonially unclean because the nature of their work required them to be around manure and (sometimes) dead carcasses. Third, they were considered unfaithful because they couldn’t leave their flocks long enough to perform all the prescribed rituals to achieve ceremonial cleanness. For these reasons, they weren’t even allowed to enter the Jewish sections of the Temple complex. As a matter of fact, their reputations were so bad that their testimonies weren’t even admissible in court.

So, when God the Father was ready to announce to the world that God the Son had been born in Bethlehem, who were the first people to hear that message? A group of shepherds, of course. It was as if God was saying to the Jewish religious elite, “You people might not think much of shepherds, but they still hold a very special place in My heart.”

Interestingly, the Greek word that is used in reference to the angel’s message is euagelizomai. This is the verb form of euangelistes, the noun from which we get the English word “evangelist.” Just as the noun refers to “one who proclaims good tidings,” the verb means “to proclaim good tidings.” This same Greek verb gets translated in Matthew 11:5 as “have the gospel preached” (N.K.J.V.). When you understand all this, you can understand why commentator Herschel Hobbs wrote, “Actually he (the angel) said, “I evangelize you to a great joy.”

And how did those shepherds respond to that angelic announcement? As soon as the entire host of angels departed from them, the shepherds said, “Let us go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has come to pass, which the Lord has made known to us” (Luke 2:15, N.K.J.V.). You’ll find no hesitation there. No debating. No doubting. They didn’t say, “Let us go to Bethlehem and see if this thing has come to pass.” Nope, they believed the good news and responded accordingly.

As I consider the shepherds and their reaction to the news of Christ’s birth, my mind goes to the lesson of 1 Corinthians 1:26=27. There, Paul says:

Remember, dear brothers and sisters, that few of you were wise in the world’s eyes or powerful or wealthy when God called you. Instead, God chose things the world considers foolish in order to shame those who think they are wise. And he chose things that are powerless to shame those who are powerful. (N.L.T.)

Those shepherds who first heard the news of Christ’s birth certainly weren’t wise in the world’s eyes. Neither were they powerful or wealthy. And yet they not only became the first people to receive the news but also to deliver it. As Luke 2:17-18 tells us:

Now when they had seen Him, they made widely known the saying which was told them concerning this Child. And all those who heard it marveled at those things which were told them by the shepherds. (N.K.J.V.)

Those last three words of that reference might well jump off the page at us. This incredible story, this message of salvation, this potentially soul-saving piece of good news wasn’t told by the priests or the scribes. Instead, it was told by the shepherds. Remember, these are the guys whose testimony isn’t even admissible in court! I mean, the news that a Savior has been born and is lying in an animal’s feeding trough in Bethlehem is unbelievable enough, but now it’s being told by men who are supposedly the most unreliable witnesses in that whole culture. God must have gotten a real kick out of that, right? And you know what? He gets just as much a kick out of us today when we share the good news about Jesus. In this way, we should all have a little “shepherd” in us, and it should come out anytime we are around someone who needs to hear the good news about the Savior.

Posted in Angels, Christ's Birth, Christmas, Evangelism, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth", The Gospel, Witnessing | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

“Christian Verses” Podcast: Luke 2:11

The new podcast centers around Luke 2:11 and deals with the simplicity of the Christmas message. It was a simple message — “A Savior is born to you this day” — first delivered to a simple group of people: shepherds. These days, of course, we have made Christmas quite busy and consequently quite complicated. We have: Black Friday, Christmas shopping, malls, online shopping, Christmas parades, Christmas plays, Christmas cantatas, Santa Claus, reindeer, elves, Charlie Brown, Frosty the Snowman, Jimmy Stewart, little Ralphie, holiday meals, family get-togethers, etc., etc., etc. Admittedly, it all makes it somewhat difficult to keep the simple message of Christmas front and center. So, hopefully, this podcast will serve as both a reminder and a motivation for you to do that. Here’s the link:

https://soundcloud.com/user-185243867/thesimplicityofchristmascv2019014

Posted in "Christian Verses" podcast, Christ's Birth, Christmas, Christmas Traditions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Joseph’s Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #2)

But while he thought about these things, behold an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.” (Matthew 1:20-21, N.K.J.V.)

Joseph went to bed that night with a lot on his mind. His betrothed bride, the young virgin to whom he was scheduled to formally marry and spend the rest of his life with as her husband, was pregnant. He didn’t know who the baby’s father was, but he knew for sure that it wasn’t him.

The Bible doesn’t tell us how Joseph found out about Mary’s pregnancy. In our day, the obvious answer would be, “Mary told him.” According to ancient Jewish wedding tradition, however, the betrothed bridegroom and the betrothed bride remained separated from each other for a period as long as a year while the bridegroom prepared a place for the couple to live after the official wedding ceremony took place. This makes it most likely that Joseph found out about Mary’s pregnancy by way of local gossip.

To make Joseph’s predicament even worse, the holy law that God had centuries earlier handed down to the people of Israel provided specific instructions for how betrothed virgins who were found to have had premarital sex were to be judged. First, if the sexual misconduct occurred in a city, both sexual partners were to be stoned to death, the assumption being that if the girl had been raped, she would have cried out for help and someone would have come to her rescue (Deuteronomy 22:23-24). Second, if the misconduct occurred in the countryside, only the man was to be killed by stoning, the assumption being that the woman was raped and her cries went unheard (Deuteronomy 22:25-27). In both cases, the two-fold point of the stoning was to “put away the evil” from the land and to allow the stoning to serve as a public warning to any potential evil-doers.

Since Joseph and Mary both lived in the city of Nazareth, the only logical conclusion Joseph could draw was that Mary’s sexual misconduct had occurred with the confines of that city. This meant that by law she was to be stoned to death as a public example. The fact was, though, that Joseph really didn’t want to push the matter that far. As Matthew 1:19 says:

Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. (N.K.J.V.)

The term “put her away” is old terminology for “divorce,” and you’ll notice that the verse refers to Joseph as “her husband.” You see, a betrothal was binding enough to cause the couple to be legally classified as “married” even before the wedding and the sexual consummation of the marriage came to pass. As such, nothing less than a legal divorce could get the man or the woman out of the betrothal. This also explains why any sexual misconduct that violated the sanctity of the betrothal period was a capital punishment offense.

Again, though, Joseph didn’t want to make Mary a public example by having her stoned. For that matter, perhaps he was also afraid that people would wrongly assume that he was the child’s father and would figure that he deserved stoning as well. So, he made the decision to divorce Mary in a way that was legal but private. This was the only possible course of action to avoid an open scandal, and there weren’t even any guarantees that it would avoid one.

It is with all of these things weighing upon him that Joseph lies down to sleep. He nods off and at some point, an angel appears to him in a dream. The angel instructs him to proceed with the betrothal/marriage because the child conceived in Mary is of the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, the child is a son whom Joseph should name “Jesus.” The name “Jesus” means “Savior.” It is the equivalent of the Hebrew name “Joshua,” which means “The Lord is Salvation.”

Okay, Joseph, now it’s time for your reaction to the news about Christ’s birth. What will you do? Will you believe the unbelievable and do as you have been instructed? Or will you defer to your own logic and follow through with your plan to divorce Mary? Tick tock, tick tock, the clock is ticking on your decision.

The Bible’s record of how Joseph reacted is found in Matthew 1:24-25:

Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife, and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS. (N.K.J.V.)

Some interpret the words “took to him his wife” to mean that Joseph went ahead and moved Mary into his home. If nothing else, they mean that he continued on with the betrothal even though the marriage wasn’t sexually consummated until after Jesus was born. We do know from Luke 2:5 that the couple were still considered “betrothed” when they traveled together to Bethlehem while Mary was still pregnant.

Whatever the exact details were, there’s absolutely no doubt as to how Joseph reacted to the news of the birth of Christ. He reacted in a wholehearted, enthusiastic way that was worthy of the man whom God was granting the staggering responsibility of overseeing Jesus’ birth and upbringing. The fact is that God presented Joseph with a challenge unlike any other challenge presented to any other man, and Joseph rose to meet it. Therefore, Joseph stands as one of history’s greatest believers, and his reaction to the news of Christ’s birth should serve as a positive motivation to us all.

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mary’s Reaction

“Reactions to Christ’s Birth” series: (post #1)

Then the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David. And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.” (Luke 1:30-33, N.K.J.V.)

We don’t know how old she was even though everyone agrees that she was probably a teenager. We don’t know anything about her family other than she was a relative to Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist (Luke 1:36). We don’t know the details of her upbringing except for the fact that she lived in Nazareth. We don’t know how she met Joseph or how their betrothing came to pass. With all these unknowns, Mary’s life before she became the most famous woman in history certainly doesn’t provide much of a background for her story.

What we do know is that she was right on verge of beginning her new life as a married Jewish woman when suddenly, without warning, without expectation, the angel Gabriel showed up and dropped a news bomb on her the likes of which the world had never seen and hasn’t seen since. “Mary, you are going to conceive the Messiah in your virgin womb and give birth to Him.” How’s that for a life-changing word from out of the blue!

Mary’s conversation with Gabriel actually began with the angel’s opening greeting to her: “Rejoice, highly favored one, the Lord is with you; blessed are you among women!” (Luke 1:28, N.K.J.V.). Interestingly, the Bible doesn’t tell us how Gabriel appeared to her. That’s one more entry in the “unknown” file about Mary. The New King James translation says concerning the start to the conversation: “And having come in, the angel said to her…” The New American Standard translation renders the original Greek in pretty much the same way, putting it: “And coming in, he said to her…” Those translations make it sound like Gabriel, perhaps in the form of a man, knocked on Mary’s door and was invited inside her home. I don’t know if this is how the event actually took place, but I certainly like the idea of it. If the meeting did begin this way, it would explain why Mary wasn’t struck with awe and fear the way eyewitnesses to angels typically are in the Bible.

While the story doesn’t say that Mary was troubled by Gabriel’s physical appearance, it does say that she was troubled by the words of his greeting. As Luke 1:29 says:

But when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and considered what manner of greeting this was. (N.K.J.V.)

Have you ever thought about the fact that Mary’s reaction to Gabriel’s opening words to her shows us quite a bit about her? When the angel told her that she was highly favored, had the Lord with her, and was blessed among women, Mary didn’t think to herself, “Of course, I am. I’m a good person. I live a holy life. If I’m not highly favored and blessed, who can be?” No, she was far too humble and lowly to hold such a lofty opinion of herself. Instead, Gabriel’s opening words of compliment to her filled Mary with confusion, trouble, and a fair amount of fright. She surely thought, “Why is he saying such things to me?” To calm Mary’s worry, Gabriel then uttered the words of our opening text: “Do not be afraid, Mary…”

But now let’s proceed to the main point of this post. Once Mary had gotten over the initial shock of the opening to the conversation, and once she had asked the obvious question of how a virgin could conceive and had been given as much answer as she was going to get (Luke 1:34-37), now it was time for her reaction to the news that Jesus, the Messiah, would soon be born into the world. And what was that reaction? We find it in Luke 1:38:

Then Mary said, “Behold the maidservant of the Lord! Let it be to me according to your word!” And the angel departed from her. (N.K.J.V.)

There it is, a reaction so simple and sincere, yet so profound. Not only did Mary believe the news about Christ’s birth, she immediately volunteered herself to play the role that God wanted her to play regarding it. And may the same be said of each of us today. No, God doesn’t want us to help bring Jesus into the world, but He definitely does want us to embrace the truth that Jesus has indeed come. Even more than that, He wants us to place our belief in Jesus for salvation and live each day as the menservants and maidservants of Christ.

Posted in Christ's Birth, Christmas, Series: "Reactions to Christ's Birth" | Tagged , , | 2 Comments